May 25, 2012

UK Employment Law Update: A recent case finds that employers may dismiss employees for refusal to accept a pay cut, even if the survival of the business isn't in issue

The UK's Employment Appeals Tribunal has confirmed that employers may dismiss employees who refuse to accept detrimental changes to terms and conditions without that dismissal being deemed "unfair" - so long as they have acted reasonably. It went on to say that an employer doesn't necessarily have to show that the business would otherwise go under (although evidence suggesting as much would help to show fairness).

When an employer seeks to make changes to employees' terms and conditions, it is well-advised to enter into consultation with the relevant employees or their representatives as the unilateral imposition of changes to terms and conditions may well be a serious breach of contract, opening up claims of constructive dismissal. Following consultation, the employer may be able to avoid liability for unfair dismissal by showing that they acted reasonably in dismissing - the key point is that the Tribunal will assess the reasonableness of the employer in seeking to implement a pay reduction, not the reasonableness of the employee in refusing.

Factors relevant to reasonableness include the size of the employer and its resources, whether the management of the company had also been asked to accept a pay cut, the process the employer adopts and how many employees accept the changes. As referred to above, the employer won't necessarily need to show that the business will go under to demonstrate reasonableness.

©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Sarah has experience in assisting with corporate, employment, competition and litigation matters. She has specific interests in the application of UK and EU competition law in various sectors, as well as in advising on both contentious and non-contentious employment matters.

+44 (0)203 349 8700

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.