May 25, 2012

Under Fire in Congress and the Courts, NLRB Postpones Workplace Posting Rule

We informed you in a recent alert of a Final Rule issued by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) requiring all employers under the NLRB’s jurisdiction to notify employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act with a workplace posting. 

The workplace poster required by the Final Rule notifies employees they have the right to act together to improve wages and working conditions, organize and join a union, bargain collectively with their employer, strike and picket, and discuss wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment, as well as the right to refrain from any of these activities.  The required poster also informs employees that their employer is prohibited from interfering with the exercise of these rights or discriminating against them because they engage in or refuse to engage in union activity.

Most private sector employers, regardless of whether their employees are unionized, will be required by the Final Rule to post the 11-by-17 inch notice where the employer posts other government notices, such as FLSA and Title VII notices, as well as “wherever notices to employees regarding personnel rules and policies are customarily posted and are readily seen by employees” (e.g., on a company’s internet or intranet site).  For more information on the content of the workplace poster required by the Final Rule, the poster is now available on the NLRB’s website and you can see it here.

This new workplace posting requirement was to be effective November 14, 2011, though we noted that proposed legislation had been introduced in Congress to rescind the Final Rule and lawsuits had been filed to block the Final Rule. 

In the U.S. House of Representatives, the proposed legislation includes the Employee Free Choice Act (H.R. 2854) and the Employee Workplace Freedom Act (H.R. 2833), both of which would result in an outright repeal of the Final Rule if passed into law. In the U.S. Senate, the Employer Free Speech Act has been introduced to prohibit the NLRB from implementing the Final Rule. 

In the courts, groups representing employers have sued the NLRB in different federal courts to block the Final Rule, including separate lawsuits by the National Association of Manufacturers and the National Federation of Independent Businesses in the federal court in Washington, D.C. and another lawsuit by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in a South Carolina federal court.  The plaintiffs in these lawsuits claim the Final Rule exceeds the NLRB's rulemaking authority and are seeking injunctions to prevent the NLRB from implementing and enforcing it.

The lawsuits filed in the District of Columbia have been consolidated and a court hearing has been scheduled in these cases for December 19, 2011.  After that court hearing was scheduled, the NLRB announced it is postponing the effective date of the new workplace posting requirement under the Final Rule to January 31, 2012. 

In its press release announcing the postponement, the NLRB stated that it was delaying the poster requirement “in order to allow for enhanced education and outreach to employers, particularly those who operate small and medium sized businesses.”   While there is speculation that the postponement resulted from the proposed legislation and the legal challenges in federal court, the NLRB stated in its announcement that “[n]o other changes in the rule, or in the form or content of the notice, will be made.”

Employers subject to the Final Rule should stay tuned for further updates on its status. 

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Louis has over 20 years of experience in cases for companies and individuals involving non-compete covenants, trade secrets and other matters associated with departing employees. He has obtained restraining orders and injunctions in numerous cases to prevent departing employees from violating non-compete agreements, diverting customer relationships and misappropriating trade secrets. Louis advises clients on using non-compete covenants in employment contracts and other business agreements, as well as a wide variety of other strategies for protection of key employees, customer relationships...

919-783-2810

About the Author

Partner

David practices in the area of employment litigation.  He regularly advises and defends clients in race, age, disability and sex discrimination and harassment cases; reviews handbooks and termination issues; and provides compliance advice on matters of employment law.

Representative Experience

McNeil v. Scotland County - Obtained summary judgment for employer where plaintiff alleged race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Successfully...

919-783-2854

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.