May 25, 2012

Understanding Which Deadlines Are Extended by the Recent IRS Guidance for Hybrid Plans

The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS recently extended certain requirements applicable to hybrid pension plans.In October 2011, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2011-85 (Notice), announcing their intent to extend certain requirements applicable to hybrid pension plans such as cash balance plans.  Given the highly technically nature of cash balance plans and the related government guidance, it is important to carefully understand the scope of the relief.

Limited Extension for Compliance with Regulations

The Notice offers only a limited extension of the effective date of the hybrid plan regulations issued on October 19, 2010.  Specifically, the relief affects only the provisions of such regulations that set forth the exclusive list of interest crediting rates and combinations of rates that satisfy the “market rate of return” requirements.  That portion of the regulations originally was scheduled to apply to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2012.  The Notice postpones the effective date to plan years beginning on or after a date to be specified in the future, but in no event earlier than January 1, 2013.

  • It is unclear when the portions of the 2010 regulations addressing a “market rate of return” will be finalized and whether those regulations will differ from the 2010 regulations.  The Notice does not offer any additional guidance to plans currently using interest crediting rates not permitted under the 2010 guidance. 
  • The Notice also states that relief from the anti-cutback provisions of Code Section 411(d)(6) is expected to apply to any plan amendment that eliminates or reduces a protected benefit (such as the right to future interest credits at a promised rate), provided that the amendment is adopted by the amendment deadline described below and the elimination or reduction is made only “to the extent necessary” to enable the plan to meet the requirements of the final regulations regarding permissible interest crediting rates.  What it means to amend a plan “to the extent necessary” to bring the plan into compliance with these rules remains uncertain.
  • As a result, many plan sponsors may want to wait for the final regulations on permissible interest crediting rates before amending their plans and notifying participants.

However, for all other purposes, a hybrid plan must operate in good faith compliance with the 2010 final hybrid plan regulations, which became effective January 1, 2011.

Broader Extension for Plan Amendments

In contrast to the limited operational relief provided by the Notice, the Notice generally extends the deadline for adopting any plan amendments to comply with the hybrid plan rules until the last day of the plan year immediately preceding the plan year for which the 2010 proposed hybrid plan regulations, once finalized, apply to the plan.  As a result of this extension, when considering determination letter applications submitted between February 1, 2011, and January 31, 2012, the IRS will not consider the 2010 final hybrid plan regulations, unless the plan has been amended to satisfy the provisions of such regulations that were effective January 1, 2011.

Finally, in a separate matter affecting cash balance plans, on October 31, 2011, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation published a proposed rule on terminating cash balance and hybrid plans.  The proposed rule is intended to implement changes made by the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Comments on the proposed rule are due December 30, 2011.

© 2012 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Partner

Joseph S. Adams is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  Joe focuses his practice on employee benefits and executive compensation matters for public, private and tax-exempt organizations

312-984-7790

About the Author

Partner

Anne S. Becker is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office

312-984-7592

Contributors

Partner

Stephen Pavlick is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Washington, D.C. office.  He focuses his practice on the area of employee benefit matters for large multinational corporations.  His clients include several Fortune 100 companies, and a major trade association.  He is a member of the Tax Management Advisory Board for Compensation Planning and is a regular participant at their monthly luncheons with government officials.  Stephen is a Certified Public Accountant. 

202-756-8312

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.