Advertisement

May 23, 2013

United States Supreme Court to Rule on Constitutionality of Healthcare Reform

One of the most important healthcare law issues of 2012 is how the United States Supreme Court will rule on the individual mandate and the Medicaid expansion mandate in the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). The ACA became law in 2010.  The individual mandate utilizes the tax collection processes under the Internal Revenue Code to penalize individuals who elect not to obtain health insurance, which individual mandate provision is to be implemented in 2014.

The Medicaid expansion mandate requires states to provide Medicaid coverage for adults less than 65 years old with incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level and to children whose families earn up to 133% of the federal poverty level, or the states risk losing their Medicaid matching funds from the federal government. On March 26 through 28, 2012, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments on the following:

  • Whether, prior to the implementation of individual mandate in 2014, the Anti-Injunction Act bars the court from considering the constitutionality of the individual mandate?
  • Whether Congress has the authority under the Commerce Clause to enact the individual mandate?
  • If Congress does not have the authority under the Commerce Clause to enact the individual mandate, then is the individual mandate severable from the ACA or is the entire ACA struck down?
  • Whether Congress exceeded its authority when it enacted the Medicaid expansion mandate?

The decisions of the United States Supreme Court on these issues will have tremendous impact on the state of healthcare reform at the federal and state level.

©2002-2013 Fowler White Boggs P.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

About the Author

Shareholder

Kathy J. Tayon practices in the areas of transactional, regulatory and operational based business and health care law.  Her transactional work includes negotiating, documenting and closing a wide array of transactions including purchases, sales, reorganizations and mergers of physician practices, ambulatory surgery centers, assisted living facilities, home health agencies and other health care entities.  Her regulatory work includes representing individuals and health care entities in determining compliance with Federal and State anti-kickback and self-referral laws and with...

954-703-3903

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.