May 25, 2012

An Update on FDA Records Access Powers

Earlier this month, FDA issued an interim final rule (and request for comments) regarding record availability requirements, new draft guidance for industry on its authority to access records, and updated Q&A guidance.  All of these have been issued as part of the implementation of the new and expanded authority given to the FDA under the Food Safety Modernization Act.  The new authority granted to the FDA allows it to access and copy records from domestic and foreign facilities that manufacture, process, pack, transport, distribute, receive, hold or import food if FDA has a reasonable belief that the food, and any other food FDA reasonably believes is likely to be affected in a similar manner, is adulterated and presents a threat of serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals.  

These newly issued documents, although non-binding on the FDA, help shed light on the following: (1) when is the FDA likely to exercise its authority to inspect and copy your records?; (2) what records can the FDA inspect and which records do they not have the authority to inspect?; (3) who do these rules apply to?; (4) what are the potential consequences from refusing to the let the FDA copy certain records?; (5) how can you protect your trade secrets from being made public?  In light of these new materials, you will want to revisit your records retention program to ensure you’re capable of complying with any FDA requests, as well as review your inspection policy to specifically address any issues in advance of an inspection or request for records

© 2012 Varnum LLP

About the Author

Partner

Steve helps regulated businesses - in particular, food and medical device companies - successfully bring their products to market. He also advises management on the day-to-day legal issues facing their companies. Steve helps his clients stay competitive while keeping a close watch on the regulatory issues that can derail products before and after they get to market.

616/336-6569

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.