May 25, 2012

Updated Effective Date: NLRB Requires Employers to Post Unionization Rights Notice

As an UPDATE to an earlier article, please take notice that, on October 5, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) announced that it would delay the effective date of its August 25 final rule that will require employers to post an NLRB-issued notice detailing employees’ unionization rights under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). Based on this new announcement, the effective date has been pushed back from November 14, 2011, until January 31, 2012. As a result, employers will have additional time to comply with the NLRB's unionization rights notice rule, as explained in the earlier posting and set forth again as follows for your ease of reference.

Specifically, the rule applies to almost all private-sector employers subject to the NLRA. Importantly, the rule applies to employers who do not have unionized workforces.

The Board’s stated motivation for implementing the posting mandate is its belief that many employees are unaware of their rights under the NLRA. Accordingly, the notice is intended to “increase knowledge of the NLRA among employees, in order to better enable the exercise of rights under the statute.” Thus, the notice informs employees of their NLRA rights, including the right to organize or join a union, to strike and picket, to raise work-related complaints with a government agency, or to choose not to do any of these activities. Additionally, the notice informs employees of numerous actions which employers and unions are prohibited from taking against them, in particular, with respect to the decision to join or not join a union. Lastly, the notice instructs employees on how to contact the NLRB.

Apart from physically posting the notice in all places where personnel rules and policies are regularly posted, employers must also post the notice electronically on any intranet or internet site where such rules and policies are customarily maintained. Additionally, for workforces in which at least 20% of employees are not proficient in English, employers are required to post a translated version of the notice – which will be provided by the Board – in the language which the employees speak.

Although the Board may not impose a fine on employers who do not post the notice, the Board could treat an employer’s failure to post the notice as an unfair labor practice. Significantly, the Board has authority under the rule to extend the 6-month statute of limitations for filing an unfair labor practice charge alleging other unfair labor practices against the non-posting employer. Moreover, the Board could consider an employer’s knowing failure to post the notice as evidence of unlawful motive in other unfair labor practice cases in which motive is an issue.

The notice is currently available for download from the NLRB’s website and may also be obtained from any one of the NLRB’s offices.
 

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Labor and employment laws affect the entire legal relationship between employers and employees, beginning with the initial hiring process and expanding into every facet of daily operations, including job descriptions, wages, promotions, reviews, terminations, benefits, mergers and acquisitions, as well as the successful resolution of disputes pertaining to unfair labor practices and discrimination. Because the laws that apply to the labor and employment relationship are found at all levels of government federal, state, county and...

213-620-1780

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.