May 25, 2012

US & China Sign Antitrust Memorandum of Understanding

On July 27, 2011, the US and China signed an antitrust memorandum of understanding(“MOU”) in an effort to promote communication and cooperation among the antitrust agencies of the two countries. The MOU was signed by the US Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice, together with China’s Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”), National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”), and State Administration for Industry and Commerce (“SAIC”).

China’s antimonopoly enforcement responsibility is divided among MOFCOM, NDRC and SAIC; MOFCOM handles the review of mergers and acquisitions, the NDRC enforces laws with respect to price-related anticompetitive conduct, and the SAIC is responsible for non-price related anticompetitive conduct. 

The MOU does not change the existing antitrust laws of either country, but rather aims to enhance the effective enforcement of competition laws by “creating a framework for long-term cooperation.” The MOU provides for periodic high-level dialogue among the MOU’s signatories, for communication and cooperation between individual US and PRC agencies, and lists specific areas for cooperation, including:

  • keeping each other informed of significant competition policy and enforcement developments,
  • enhancing each agency’s capabilities with appropriate activities related to competition policy and law such as training programs, workshops, study missions and internships,
  • exchanging experiences on competition law enforcement,
  • seeking information or advice from one another regarding matters of competition law enforcement and policy,
  • providing comments on proposed changes to competition laws, regulations, rules and guidelines,
  • exchanging views with respect to multicultural competition law and policy, and
  • exchanging experiences in raising awareness of competition law and policy.

Although broad in nature, the MOU is expected to usher in an era of enhanced cooperation among the US and China’s antitrust agencies.

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

The Antitrust and Trade Regulation practice currently encompasses matters involving mergers and structural issues, criminal grand jury proceedings, international antitrust enforcement, pricing practices, product distribution, joint ventures, class actions based on federal and state antitrust and unfair competition laws, among many other areas. We represent clients in a wide variety of industries, including healthcare, pharmaceuticals, financial services, aerospace, energy, technology, publishing, distribution, courier and food services.

The firm's Antitrust lawyers both...

415-774-3234

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.