Advertisement

May 19, 2013

U.S. Clinical Trial Website Pairing — a Need for Privacy Safeguards

Fox Trial Finder is a welcomed initiative in ongoing efforts to facilitate clinical trial participation.  In a recent interview with ABC’s Diane Sawyer, Michael J. Fox, who suffers from Parkinson’s disease, said that in addition to his support for stem cell research addressing Parkinson’s, he also supports research looking for a cure on other fronts, including drug therapies and diagnostic tests. (Article Link)  Toward that end, Fox’s Foundation for Parkinson’s Research recently launched an online initiative called Fox Trial Finder.  This website promotes research across the country by pairing patients with clinical trials in their areas, based on the individual’s symptom profile.  The foundation’s webpage notes that 30% of all clinical trials fail to recruit even one subject, and that 85% of clinical trials are delayed because of insufficient subject enrollment – so Fox’s initiative (and others like it that focus on other diseases) may well spur needed research.

One impediment encountered with Fox’s and others’ webpages relates to privacy protection.  As noted in the “Terms and Conditions of Use” for Fox Trial Finder, this service is not protected by HIPAA (the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act).  HIPAA regulates the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information only by “covered entities”, which are health care providers, health plans, and health care clearinghouses.  Others (like Fox Trial Finder) that obtain and use health data are not subject to the privacy protections in the HIPAA privacy rule – and this may give pause to individuals who are contemplating signing up.  Legislative reform in the US, patterned after data privacy laws in Europe, might help address this problem.  In Europe, privacy safeguards for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information attaches to the data and applies to all data controllers.  A more comprehensive legislative data protection paradigm that protects private health information in anyone’s hands likely would encourage more prospective research subjects to sign up with research study pairings sites like Fox Trial Finder.

©2013 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

Partner

Robyn S. Shapiro is a partner in the Health Care Practice Group.  She has significant experience in representing clients with respect to bioethics issues, medical staff matters, health information privacy, informed consent, regulatory and licensing matters, human subjects research compliance and employment and other business issues.  Robyn's past positions as Ursula Von der Ruhr professor of bioethics and director of the Bioethics Center at the Medical College of Wisconsin complement her wide-ranging experience in health law.  Nightingale's...

414-221-6056

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.