Advertisement

May 21, 2013

US Foods Settles EEOC Race Discrimination Suit for $165,000

Food Service  Distribution Company Fired Employee  Due  to Race, Federal Agency Charged

US Foods, Inc., formerly known as U.S.  Foodservice, Inc., a Rosemont, Ill.-based food product distributor, will pay  $165,000 and furnish other relief to settle a race discrimination lawsuit  filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency  announced today.

In its lawsuit, the EEOC charged that US Foods  violated federal law by firing an African-American employee who worked at its  Memphis facility because of his race.   Specifically, the EEOC said, the company discharged the black employee  after he failed to stop a Caucasian driver who reported to work under the  influence of alcohol from making deliveries on his route.  US Foods did not terminate the Caucasian  driver for being under the influence, or another Caucasian safety specialist  who saw the driver at the first stop on his route.  Instead, the company discharged the white  driver later for an unrelated matter.

Race discrimination violates  Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.   The EEOC filed suit (Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-02861) in U.S. District  Court for the Western District of Tennessee after first attempting a  pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.

Besides monetary relief, the  18-month consent decree settling the lawsuit enjoins US Foods from further  discriminating against employees on the basis of race.  The decree requires training on employee  rights under Title VII and requires US Foods to maintain records of  discriminatory complaints and provide annual reports to the EEOC.  The decree also requires US Foods to post a  notice to all employees about the lawsuit that provides the EEOC's contact  information.

 "It has long been plainly unlawful for a  company to apply different standards of conduct and discipline to employees  based on race," said Faye A. Williams, regional attorney for the EEOC's Memphis  District Office, which has jurisdiction over Arkansas, Tennessee and portions  of Mississippi.  "The EEOC will continue  to fight to eradicate this type of discrimination." 

US Foods distributes food  products, cleaning supplies, and food service equipment throughout the  country.  The company employs more than  25,000 associates in more than 60 locations.

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.