Advertisement

May 22, 2013

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Continues Trend of Employer I-9 Investigations

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has initiated a new round of I-9 investigations. The agency has indicated that the emphasis is on “businesses related to critical infrastructure and key resources,” which includes sectors such as banking and finance, commercial nuclear reactors, dams, drinking water and water treatment systems, government facilities, information technology, telecommunications and transportation systems, among others.

These inspections seek to ensure that companies hire only individuals authorized to work in the United States, and they involve inspecting I-9 forms and documents provided by employees in order to verify identity and employment authorization.

An employer typically has three days from receipt of the notice of inspection to produce the I-9 forms for review; additional supporting documentation may be requested as well. If violations are found, ICE may impose a number of different penalties. Depending on the severity of the violation, these can range from fines to preclusion from bidding for federal contracts. In the most serious cases, criminal charges may be filed.

In addition to these I-9 inspections by ICE, employers of foreign nationals are also subject to site visits by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). In these site visits, DHS intends to confirm that the employer is a bona fide organization that knowingly filed the visa petition for its employee, and that the employee is actually working for the employer in the position that was the subject of the visa petition, and at the wage promised in the petition. No prior notice of a site visit is given; the inspecting officer simply shows up at the job site.

While there is no way to prevent a site visit or the issuance of a notice of inspection, good policies and practices are essential to avoiding problems. It is critical that employers implement an immigration compliance policy that requires their organization to routinely conduct internal I-9/immigration audits and engage in regular and systematic training of personnel charged with the responsibility for I-9s and other immigration matters.

© 2013 Vedder Price

About the Author

Shareholder

Gabrielle M. Buckley is a shareholder in the firm’s Corporate Practice Area. Ms. Buckley has over 25 years of experience counseling U.S.- and foreign-based companies with regard to all aspects of employment-related immigration laws. She advises employers as to immigration law issues arising in corporate mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and other forms of corporate reorganization. Ms. Buckley assists clients in obtaining temporary and permanent immigration status in virtually every immigration category. She develops immigration compliance policies for employers and...

312-609-7626

About the Author

Associate

P. Michelle Jacobson joined the Chicago office of Vedder Price as an associate in the Corporate Practice Area, and has been practicing in the field of business immigration since 2001.

Ms. Jacobson counsels employers on employment strategies, corporate compliance and visa processing for foreign national employees. She works closely with corporate clients to develop strategies and procedures for defending workplace sanctions and formulating compliance policies. Ms. Jacobson conducts I-9 audits and advises clients with regard to hiring and discrimination issues. Her practice focuses on...

312-609-7761

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.