Advertisement

May 19, 2013

US Labor Department seeks to recover more than $436,000 for 2 employee benefit plans of Columbus, Ohio-based Clark Graphics

Suit alleges plan administrator mismanaged retirement funds

COLUMBUS, Ohio – The U.S. Department of Labor has filed a complaint in federal court seeking to restore $436,322.07 to two benefit plans of Columbus-based Clark Graphics. Based on the findings of an investigation by the department’s Employee Benefits Security Administration, the lawsuit alleges that the plans’ administrator, Pension Retirement Planning, along with its president, Marcia Dowdell, failed to account for money deposited to the plans in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

Additionally, the suit alleges that the owners of Clark Graphics – Mary Clark, James Clark and Stephen Clark – failed in their fiduciary responsibilities as plan trustees by neglecting to monitor the actions of Dowdell and Pension Retirement Planning. They failed to review and reconcile account statements for EBSA Form 5500 filings, review participant distribution calculations and require Pension Retirement Planning to issue participant statements.

“Our legal action underscores the Labor Department’s commitment to hold accountable those who are entrusted with the assets of workers’ retirement plans,” said EBSA Assistant Secretary Phyllis C. Borzi. “We will continue to help workers obtain their rightful benefits when plan fiduciaries violate the law.”

Specifically, the suit alleges that Dowdell failed to account for $326,147.22 out of more than $1.1 million that was transferred into a trust account maintained by Pension Retirement Planning on behalf of the Clark Graphics Profit Sharing Plan from May 30, 2000, to Aug. 31, 2009. Additionally, Dowdell failed to account for $110,174.85 out of $1 million placed by the Clark Graphics Defined Benefit Plan in the trust during the same period.  Dowdell failed to maintain accurate records for participants in both plans; consequently, some participants have not received the correct retirement benefits.

The complaint seeks the restoration of all plan losses for which the defendants are liable, with appropriate interest. It also seeks to permanently enjoin all four individuals from serving as a fiduciary or service provider to any employee benefit plan subject to ERISA.

Pension Retirement Planning provided third-party record-keeping services to as many as 51 ERISA-covered pension plans during the decade leading up to 2010, when the company ceased operations.

EBSA’s Cincinnati Regional Office conducted the investigation, and the case is being litigated by the Labor Department’s regional solicitor in Chicago. For help with problems related to private sector retirement and health plans, employers and workers can reach EBSA’s Chicago office at 312-353-0900 or toll-free at 866-444-3272. Additional information can be found at www.dol.gov/ebsa.

Solis v. Clark Graphics Inc., Mary Clark, James Clark, Stephen Clark, Marcia Dowdell, Clark Graphics Defined Benefit Plan and Clark Graphics Profit Sharing Plan
Civil Action Number:  2:11-cv-00870

© Copyright 2012 U.S. Department of Labor

About the Author

Our Mission is to foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners, job seekers, and retirees of the United States; improve working conditions; advance opportunities for profitable employment; and assure work-related benefits and rights.

866-487-2365

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.