April 16, 2014

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Announces Changes to Most Patent Fees

The America Invents Act provides the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) with the authority to set its own fees in order to recover the PTO’s costs. The PTO recently announced its new fee schedule, including many changes that will take effect on March 19, 2013. The most significant changes are summarized below.

  • Total filing fees for utility applications will increase from $1,260 to $1,600;
  • Filing fees for design application will increase from $530 to $760;
  • Maintenance fees will increase substantially:
    • 4th year fee – increasing from $1,150 to $1,600;
    • 8th year fee – increasing from $2,900 to $3,600;
    • 12th year fee – increasing from $4,810 to $7,400;
  • The fee for filing a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) will increase from $930 to $1200, plus a surcharge of $500 for each subsequent RCE;
  • The fee for filing an appeal will decrease from $1,260 to $800, although there is a new fee of $2,000 for forwarding the appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeals Board;
  • Cost of ex parte reexamination will decrease from $17,750 to $12,000; inter partes review will cost $23,000, while post-grant review will cost $30,000;
  • Claim fees will increase from $250 to $420 for each independent claim in excess of three, and from $62 to $80 for each claim in excess of twenty; and
  • The fee for requesting prioritized examination will decrease from $4,800 to $4,000.

Furthermore, most fees will be reduced by 50% for small entities and by 75% for micro-entities, which include universities.

In addition, a couple of changes will go into effect on January 1, 2014:

  • Issue fees for utility patents will decrease from $1,770 to $960;
  • Issue fees for design patents will decrease from $1,010 to $560; and
  • Recording an assignment electronically will be free (reduced from $40).

In light of the impending fee increases, most applicants will likely wish to file new applications before the changes take effect. However, there are some circumstances in which it may be desirable to delay filing an application or a new request, particularly if no new subject matter will be disclosed.


About the Author

richard l. kaiser, partner, michael best law firm

Richard Kaiser is a partner in our Intellectual Property Practice Group, focusing on patent prosecution for the mechanical arts and having extensive experience with both utility and design patents. Mr. Kaiser works closely with clients to provide meaningful and practical guidance on both U.S. and foreign patent strategies. He is proficient with all steps of the patenting process, from initial patentability searching and analysis, to patent application drafting, and finally with the nuances of prosecuting the pending patent applications before the various patent offices. Mr. Kaiser also has...


About the Author

brian j.n. marstall, member, michael best law firm

Brian Marstall is a member of the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the Milwaukee office.


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.