May 25, 2012

U.S. Supreme Court Decision Could Impact Public Educational Institutions

The Hastings College of Law in California maintains a non-discrimination policy for its clubs, barring discrimination in membership on a number of bases, including religion and sexual orientation. The Christian Legal Society objected, and attempted to block membership to homosexuals or those who held religious convictions other than those included in the club's "statement of faith." Both the trial court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the law school's non-discrimination policy was reasonable and viewpoint neutral. On June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed those decisions.

The Supreme Court held that the so called "all-comers" policy is a reasonable, neutral condition for access to clubs and organizations at the law school. Accordingly, the Supreme Court upheld the Hastings College of Law's non-discrimination policy.

This decision could impact clubs/organizations at any public educational institution, as the Supreme Court's "all comers" policy could become the industry standard.

About the Author

Partner

Kelly Frels, the firm's managing partner from 1995 through 2001 and the managing partner of the Houston office from 2001 to 2003, has been an attorney for public and private schools, independent school districts, community colleges, universities and other public bodies for more than 35 years. He has experience in all areas of public law including civil rights litigation, employment, student discipline, the First Amendment, desegregation and policy development and implementation. He also focuses on government strategies, employment contracts, grievances,...

713-221-1203

Contributors

Partner

Jarvis Hollingsworth provides legal counsel and strategic representation to public entities and officials, including municipalities, pension funds and retirement systems, educational institutions, and the directors and trustees that govern them. He advises clients on government strategies, employment contracts, grievances, employee terminations, school and college governance, coalition building, strategic communications and policy development. He provides counsel on open meetings, public information, bidding and contract matters, municipal bonds and public finance, and...

713-221-1460

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.