December 22, 2014

Advertisement

December 19, 2014

U.S. Supreme Court Decision in McCutchen Employment Case Leaves 11th Circuit Precedent Unscathed

In its decision published yesterday in U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3156 (April 16, 2013), the United States Supreme Court said what the Eleventh Circuit has been saying all along:  Recovery through (and defenses to) Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Sec. 502(a)(3) are limited to enforcement of the terms of the plan, and cannot be crafted in contradiction of clear plan terms.  In so holding, the Supreme Court reversed the Third Circuit, whose holding was recently lambasted by a District Court in the 11th Circuit in Schwade v. Total Plastics, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist Lexis 37091 (M.D. Fla. 2012) (See April 5, 2012 blog for a more detailed discussion.)  The Supreme Court cited Zurich American Ins. Co. v. O’Hara, 604 F. 3d 1232 (11th Cir. 2010) as authority with which it was siding (See Footnote 2.)

Copyright © 2014 Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Katherine Thompson Lange, Labor Employment Attorney, Womble Carlyle Law Firm
Attorney

Kathy’s practice has focused almost exclusively in the area of ERISA employee benefit plan litigation for over fifteen years. She has represented plans, plan administrators and plan fiduciaries in hundreds of lawsuits involving a variety of employee benefit plan issues, including benefit entitlement, COBRA compliance and statutory compliance.  Kathy has represented clients in a wide range of industries, including insurance, health care, financial and manufacturing. 

704-331-4939