May 25, 2012

USCIS Proposes to Raise Filing Fees for Immigration Benefits

Gregory P. Adams
Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Immigration
All Federal
Printer-friendly
Email this Article
Download PDF
Reprints & Permissions

USCIS is seeking to raise immigration filing fees to close a projected $200 million budget deficit for the 2010-2011 fiscal year. This comes only three years after USCIS raised filing fees an average of 66%. The new proposal would raise fees an average of 10%. USCIS highlights in its proposal that it will not raise fees in a few areas such as naturalization applications, but in many core petition types such as I-129 work visa petitions, there will be increases. The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) wants USCIS to tie any rate increases to improvements in adjudication times and in better quality of case adjudication.
 

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Gregory P. Adams
Partner

Gregory P. Adams is a Partner in the Corporate Department and Chair of the Immigration Practice Group. Greg concentrates his practice on U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law. He counsels domestic and international businesses, educational institutions, and not-for-profit entities regarding temporary and permanent business-, employment-, and investment-related U.S. visas. He has represented high tech (Route 128/495) clients on immigration cases for two decades, including development of immigration policies and the architecture and procedures for handling large volumes of cases. Greg also...

gregory.adams@dinsmore.com
513-977-8125
www.dinsmore.com

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.