Advertisement

May 24, 2013

USEPA Announces Final Utility MACT Rule

On December 21, 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") released a final rule setting forth mercury and air toxics standards for power plants (commonly referred to as the "Utility MACT"). The rule applies to electric generating units that are larger than 25 megawatts and burn coal or oil. All existing sources will have at least three years to attain the standards, and state permitting authorities could grant sources an additional year (which EPA expects states typically will grant) as needed for technology installation. EPA also issued an enforcement policy document on December 16, 2011, that provides a procedure for certain units to obtain an additional (fifth) year if necessary to mitigate risks to electric reliability.

Some of the major provisions of the rule include:

  • Establishing numerical emission limits for mercury, filterable PM (as a surrogate for toxic non-mercury metals), and HCl (as a surrogate for all toxic acid gases).
  • Establishing alternative numeric emission standards, including SO2 (as an alternate to HCl), individual non-mercury metal air toxics (as an alternate to PM), and total non-mercury metal air toxics (as an alternate to PM) for some power plant subcategories.
  • Setting work practice standards, rather than numerical limits, to limit emissions of organic air toxics.
  • Revising NSPS standards by setting new numerical emission limits for PM, SO2, and NOx at fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units.

Some of the major changes from the proposed rule include:

  • Establishing work practice standards during startup and shutdown that require units to minimize toxic emissions during these times by burning "clean fuels."
  • Establishing a final emission limit for filterable PM as a surrogate for non-mercury metallic air toxics rather than total PM.
  • Clarifying coal subcategory definitions to be more specific about which limits apply to which units.
  • Revising some new source standards to reflect what emission levels USEPA expects new sources to achieve when they are outfitted with "a full suite of state-of-the-art controls."

Concerns remain within the energy industry that this rule may cause decreased reliability and may force many electric generating units into retirement. The new rule will become effective 60 days after the date of its publication in the Federal Register. More information, including the text of the rule, can be found at http://www.epa.gov/mats

© 2013 Schiff Hardin LLP

About the Author

Schiff Hardin's diverse environmental practice advises clients engaged in a wide variety of industries and commercial endeavors such as electric generation, natural gas distribution and production, chemical manufacturing, auto and auto parts manufacturing, consumer goods manufacturing, real estate development and investments by financial institutions and equity investors.

Chambers USA has recognized our practice as one of the best in their annual rankings for the past five years. Two of our attorneys were named Leading Lawyers in Illinois by Chambers USA ...

312-258-5516

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.