Advertisement

July 22, 2014

USSC: Validity Of Noncompetition Agreement Containing Arbitration Provision Cannot, Under The Supremacy Clause, Be Addressed By State Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled yesterday that the Oklahoma supreme court acted improperly by ruling on the validity of employment-related noncompetition agreements containing valid arbitration provisions, rather than leaving that determination to the arbitrator.  In Nitro-Lift Technologies v. Howard, two former employees filed an action in state court seeking a declaration that their noncompetition agreements were null and void under state law.  Ultimately, the state supreme court held that the agreements were unenforceable pursuant to an Oklahoma statute which limits the enforceability of noncompetition agreements.

The Court vacated that decision, holding that, under the Federal Arbitration Act, it is for the arbitrator to decide in the first instance whether the noncompetition agreements were valid as a matter of applicable state law.  The Court further explained that, although the agreements’ validity was a state law issue, pursuant to the Supremacy Clause, state courts must follow the FAA.  The Nitro-Lift decision is yet another example of the Court reiterating its position that the FAA embodies a “national policy favoring arbitration” and that national policy should guide courts when faced with an arbitration agreement.  Employers seeking to enforce arbitration agreements often meet resistance in state court but, as Nitro-Lift demonstrates, they are backed by a strong national policy favoring private dispute resolution.

©2014 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Jay P. Lechner is a board certified labor and employment lawyer, specializing in the defense of discrimination, whistleblower, harassment, and wage and hour cases, as well as restrictive covenants, retaliation, related state tort and contract issues, and other types of employment litigation.

813-318-5700

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.