May 25, 2012

The Value of Time in the Legal Profession

 

I don't know that there are any short cuts to doing a good job.

--Sandra Day O'Connor

If anyone ought to know the value of time, you would think it would be lawyers.  Many of us send out pieces of paper at the end of the month asking for money based upon the amount of time spent on clients' matters.

And yet to do good work--really good legal work--it often takes more time than we feel like we have and more time than clients want to pay for.

I'm not just talking about the time and care involved in proofing a brief to get it letter perfect, although that that is certainly part of it. My group of law nerd neat freaks reserves about 5 to 7 days before filing just for client comments, proofing, bluebooking, and more proofing. And the brief is usually out the door by early afternoon on the day of filing.

Yeah, we're those guys--the ones who never drafted a term paper the night before it was due or crammed for a test.  Sorry.

When law is done right, time is used in all sorts of other ways, some of which don't look like "working" and some of which do not even appear on the time sheet. For example:

  • the time it takes to really sit still and think through a problem
  • the time it takes to think about how your rule of law fits with the law as a whole
  • the time it takes to put yourself on the other side of the bench (or even the other side of the case) and make your position seem reasonable from that point of view
  • and  time not thinking about the case so that you're fresh enough to have that stroke of insight that can make all the difference.

Whether or not this "time" ends up on the time sheet, it is valuable time.  Yet we so often clutter our thought space with trivial busywork or Google ourselves to distraction--to which I frankly plead guilty.

Sure, you could practice law without investing this kind of time. You can look only at the short term advantage to be gained if you tie your opponent's shoe laces together or hornswaggle a judge into accepting a position you know that you you'll never hold in the long run.

But these are all short cuts, and as Justice O'Connor said, there are no shortcuts to doing a good job.  It takes time.

© 2012 Andrews Kurth LLP

About the Author

Partner

Kendall is a board certified civil appellate specialist who has represented clients in state and federal appellate courts such as the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeal for the Fifth, Ninth, Tenth and Federal Circuits, the Supreme Court of Texas and many intermediate courts of appeal. His practice includes a variety of complex commercial, medical malpractice and toxic tort matters, as well as a particular focus in disputes involving employee benefits, managed care and ERISA. The disputes commonly require complex written and oral advocacy on such topics as ERISA...

713-220-3981

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.