Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Volcker Rule: Federal Reserve: Compliance with Volcker Rule Required by July 2014

Federal Reserve: Compliance with Volcker Rule Required by July 2014

The Federal Reserve has clarified that banking entities will have until July 21, 2014 to conform to the new Section 13 of the Bank Holding Act of 1956 (the “Volcker Rule”), added by Dodd-Frank Section 619. Each nonbank financial company will have two years from the date on which it becomes a nonbank financial company supervised by the Fed in which to conform.

The Volcker Rule generally prohibits banking entities from engaging in proprietary trading or from acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in, sponsoring, or having certain relationships with a hedge fund or private equity fund, subject to certain exemptions. It also provides for nonbank financial companies supervised by the Fed that engage in such activities or have such interests or relationships to be subject to additional capital requirements, quantitative limits, or other restrictions.

The Volcker Rule is scheduled to take effect July 21, 2012. Banking entities and nonbank financial companies will have a two-year grace period in which to conform their activities to the rule. The Fed may extend this period in one-year increments on individual bases, up to three years, if consistent with the purpose of the rule and not detrimental to the public interest.

On February 9, 2011, the Fed issued its final rule implementing the conformance period. Numerous industry participants and commenters, including SIFMA, Bank of New York Mellon, and Credit Suisse, requested clarification of this rule, prompting the Fed to issue a statement of policy on April 19, 2012.

According to this statement, “the Conformance Rule provides each banking entity with a period of 2 years after the effective date of section 13 (i.e., until July 21, 2014) in which to fully conform its activities and investments to the prohibitions and requirements of section 13 and the final implementing rules, unless that period is extended by the Board .... The Conformance Rule also provides a nonbank financial company supervised by the Board with 2 years after the date the company becomes a nonbank financial company supervised by the Board to comply with any applicable requirements of section 13 of the BHC Act, including any applicable capital requirements or quantitative limitations adopted thereunder, unless that period is extended by the Board.”

In the interim, the Fed expects these banking entities to engage in good-faith efforts to meet the July 2014 deadline, including self-evaluations of activities and investments for conformance, developing and implementing a specific conformance plan, and complying with reporting and recordkeeping rules as adopted by the relevant agencies.

While the CFTC, SEC, FDIC and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have rulemaking authority under the Volcker Rule, the Fed alone determines the conformance grace period.

© 2013 Schiff Hardin LLP

About the Author

Schiff Hardin is proud to have nationally recognized expertise in securities and futures regulation. In 2010 our practice was nationally ranked by Chambers USA — America's Leading Lawyers for Business in Financial Services Regulation: Broker Dealer (Compliance).

Distinctive and Distinguished Practice

Our securities and futures regulation team is respected throughout the securities and futures industries, and represents a broad range of clients involved in the formation, distribution, trading, advising and transfer of securities and futures products and...

312.258.5500

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.