Advertisement

May 21, 2013

West Texas Oil Field Service Company Settles EEOC National Origin Harassment Suit Mid-Trial

Hispanic Boss Menacingly Mistreated Crew  He Called ‘Wetbacks’ Because of Their Mexican Heritage

Midland, Texas-based Blue Ridge Resources, L.L.C. has settled a national  origin harassment lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity  Commission (EEOC) on the second day of trial, before the case was submitted to  the jury, the federal agency announced today. The settle­ment pays three former oil field service crew members $43,000  in damages for the mistreat­ment and provides extensive injunctive relief to  prevent future unlawful conduct.

The  EEOC’s suit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Midland/  Odessa Division (7:10-CV-00117-RAJ), charged that Blue Ridge Resources subjected  three former oil rig workers to a hostile work environ­ment based on their  Mexican national origin.  The discrimin­ation  alleged was at the hands of a supervisor who repeatedly referred to the  subordinates as “wet­backs” irrespective of the fact that one was born in the United States and the other two are permanent  residents who have been authorized to work in the U.S. for decades.  

According  to the EEOC, Blue Ridge’s crew supervisor over  the rig, George Gutierrez -- who is also of Mexican national origin --  subjected the three field workers to daily slurs based on their Mexican  heritage, including, “wetbacks” and “dirty Mexicans.”  The EEOC further charged that Gutierrez, who  had admitted to a nickname of “Wetback Killer,” would deny the men water while  working in the unrelenting heat of West Texas,  telling them that “wetbacks don’t need no water.”  The first victim to testify at the trial,  which started on April 30, told the jury that Gutierrez threatened to fire him  if he went over the harasser’s head to complain.   The EEOC also argued that although top  management at Blue Ridge did not engage in the  harassment, the company was ultimately responsible for lack of training of its  supervisor and for never having spoken with the workers about the supervisor’s  alleged conduct even after the matter came to their attention.

National  origin harassment violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, even when  the harasser is the same national origin as the victim.  The EEOC filed suit after first attempting to  reach a pre-litigation settle­ment through its conciliation process.  Midland attorney Holly B. Williams inter­vened  in the EEOC's case on behalf of one of the victims.

“This was an outrageous case of hard-working and vulnerable  field workers who were abused by a boss who shared the same heritage as his  victims,” said EEOC Senior Trial Attorney Devika Seth, the lead attorney on the  case.  “We hope that this settlement  sends a message to employers – including those in the oil industry – that a dismissive  approach to what goes on out in the field will not be tolerated.”

In addition to the monetary relief,  the consent decree signed by U.S. District Judge Robert Junell on July 13,  2012, requires the company to:

  • revise its discrimination policy to include  national origin harassment, and procedures to ensure that employee complaints  are addressed while providing multiple avenues for reporting violations;
  • conduct annual training for five years on laws  against national origin harassment in the workplace, and the proper procedure  for investigation of complaints; and
  • post an anti-discrimination policy notice – in  English and Spanish – at its office and shop.

EEOC  Dallas District Director Janet Elizondo said, “These men were subjected to a  hostile environment of fear, insults and intimidation, while options for good  paying jobs elsewhere were limited.  This  injunctive relief in an industry where communication may be a challenge due to  the remoteness of assigned loca­tions is important to the concept of promoting  employer accountability, wherever the job site may be.”

“Condescending or  hostile attitudes and prejudices against persons of Mexican or Latin-American  ancestry unfortunately remain all too common,” said Robert A. Canino, regional  attorney of the EEOC’s Dallas District Office.    “As we saw in this case, some Hispanic supervisors may even try to  distance themselves from their Hispanic subordinates and mistreat them so as to  separate themselves in the eyes of non-Latino business owners and  operators.” 

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.