April 20, 2014

What is the Proper Jurisdiction for Children Issues

Pursuant to statute, in a Florida divorce proceeding, courts have the authority to, at any time, order either or both parents to pay support to the other parent.  Further, the courts have the authority to approve, grant or modify a parenting plan, which sets forth a timesharing schedule. A court’s power to make such decisions is known as jurisdiction, and such jurisdiction is inherent in a divorce proceeding brought before the proper tribunal.

Jurisdiction over such issues outside of a divorce proceeding, however, can be much more complex. By way of example, in a paternity proceeding where each parent resides in a different state, the first question often asked is what court has jurisdiction to hear the matter or, stated differently, the authority to make decisions related to the paternity proceeding, such as child support and child custody.

These legal questions require an understanding of the various statutes that govern jurisdiction in Florida. For instance, Florida has enacted the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”) in order to avoid jurisdictional competition and conflict among courts of other states in matters of child custody.  Pursuant to the UCCJEA, therefore, a Florida court has jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination – such as in the paternity case example mentioned above – only if:

(a)   Florida is the “home state” of child (a defined term in the Florida Statutes) on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the child within 6 months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from Florida, but a parent continues to live in Florida; or

(b)  A court of another state does not have jurisdiction under paragraph (a), or a court of the home state of the child has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the grounds that Florida is the more appropriate forum, and:

1. The child and the child’s parents, or the child and at least one parent, have a significant connection with Florida other than mere physical presence; and

2. Substantial evidence is available in Florida concerning the child’s care, protection, training, and personal relationships; or

(c)  All courts having jurisdiction under paragraph (a) and paragraph (b) have declined to exercise jurisdiction on the grounds that a court of this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child; or

(d)  No court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in paragraph (a), paragraph (b), or paragraph (c).

There can be several, often complicated, legal arguments made by each party when jurisdiction in a child custody case is contested, i.e., when each party is asserting that his or her state has jurisdiction to determine child custody in their proceeding.  For instance, parents may argue over which state is the minor child’s “home state” as defined by statute, or whether Florida has any significant connections with the minor child.

Similarly, child support, which is governed by the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, can pose challenging jurisdictional questions as well.  It is important to speak with an attorney about these issues immediately before filing a proceeding as they are crucial to ensuring that a court of proper jurisdiction will be making the child custody and support determinations in your matter.

© Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, PA, 2014. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Crystal Espinosa Buit, Family Law attorney, Lowndes Drosdick Law firm

Crystal Espinosa Buit is an associate in the Family and Marital Law practice, devoted to family law matters including dissolution of marriage, child support, child custody, alimony and family law litigation involving complex financial and parenting issues. Crystal also works in the firm’s burgeoning eDiscovery practice.


About the Author

Rebecca Palmer, Family, Marital Attorney, Lowndes, law firm

Rebecca Palmer leads the Family & Marital Law practice. She has a broad background in providing alternative dispute resolution, general litigation, and collaborative law issues for domestic disputes for nineteen years. Rebecca's matters range from pre-marital agreements, divorce, and adoptions to difficult dissolutions, complex financial issues and custody cases. A Supreme Court Certified Family Mediator, she is experienced in all methods of case resolution, including mediation, arbitration, facilitation and negotiations to serve individuals as well as businesses.



Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.