Advertisement

May 24, 2013

What The Supreme Court's Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Could Mean For Franchises

Several news stories around the web today discuss the United States Supreme Court's Ruling on the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and what it could mean for franchised businesses.  As I said yesterday, I sincerely hope these gloomy predictions are not accurate.  Franchising has started to rebound as an industry, and I would hate to see that growth stymied.  After all, franchises account for a very large percentage of all small businesses around the country, and small business is the engine on which this country's economy runs. 

  • From Nasdaq / Dow Jones: Restaurants, Retailers Disappointed With Health-Care Mandate. Quotes National Retail Federation's Chief Executive, Matthew Shay, as saying "as it stands, the law wrongly focuses more on penalizing employers and the private sector than reducing health costs. Although the Court upheld the law's constitutionality, many problems remain: It penalizes employers too much; it doesn't do enough to reduce the cost of health care; and it is unreasonably complicated and difficult to implement and administer."

  • From the Washington Post, an op-ed piece by Fastsigns CEO Catherine Monson: Why the health-care ruling may stop franchises from opening new stores, creating new jobs.  According to Ms. Monson, "the law will deter growth by unintentionally discouraging franchisees from owning and operating multiple locations, creating a competitive disadvantage for our franchisees who do own more than one or two locations (and who may want to open additional stores), and barriers to entrepreneurs who are looking to capitalize on the franchise business model to grow their business and hire more workers." 

© Copyright 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP. All rights reserved

About the Author

Partner

Matt Kreutzer serves as Chair of the firm's Franchise, Distribution and Antitrust practice group and is a Certified Specialist in Franchise and Distribution Law by the California State Bar's Board of Legal Specialization. He has spent more than a decade working with individuals and companies on issues relating to franchise law and is well-versed in all stages of the franchise relationship. 

702-678-5070

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.