July 24, 2014

What to Consider Now Regarding the March 16, 2013 Patent Law Change

March 16, 2013 begins the new era of First Inventor to File, enacted under the America Invents Act. Information regarding the change is abundant, and perhaps overwhelming. But there is a key determination to be made right now: whether to file an application by March 15, 2013 in order to remain under the current First to Invent law.

There are 2 key reasons to file some patent applications by March 15, 2013:

  • There is currently less prior art available to patent examiners to reject an application;
  • Any patent issuing on the application will not be subject to the new Post Grant Review proceeding (a proceeding with broadened grounds for invalidity attack).

There are 3 main scenarios that may warrant filing by March 15, 2013:

  • A provisional application is already on file, but more subject matter is ready to be added to further define the invention in a non-provisional application;
  • A non-provisional application is already on file, but a new continuation-in-part application or an entirely new application is desired to add new matter to the original invention;
  • An invention is ready to be described and filed in the form of a new provisional or non-provisional application.

There are 2 scenarios in which filing by March 15, 2013 may not be needed:

  • Applications (provisionals or non-provisionals) are already on file with the Patent Office, and no new matter need be added;
  • Filing new continuing applications with claims that are fully supported by a parent application filed before March 16, 2013.

These points are guidelines to help with making informed decisions in the coming weeks. Every situation is different and we understand that the patent laws are not the only driving factor in filing decisions. 


About the Author

richard l. kaiser, partner, michael best law firm

Richard Kaiser is a partner in our Intellectual Property Practice Group, focusing on patent prosecution for the mechanical arts and having extensive experience with both utility and design patents. Mr. Kaiser works closely with clients to provide meaningful and practical guidance on both U.S. and foreign patent strategies. He is proficient with all steps of the patenting process, from initial patentability searching and analysis, to patent application drafting, and finally with the nuances of prosecuting the pending patent applications before the various patent offices. Mr. Kaiser also has...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.