May 25, 2012

When Employees Leave, Make Sure Your Information Security Doesn’t Walk Out the Door With Them

An employee’s departure represents a significant threat to an organization’s information security if sufficient procedures are not in place (and actually followed) in connection with the departure.

Here are some important steps to take to keep departing employees (whether resigning or terminated) from undermining your security, whether unwittingly or intentionally.

  • Make sure the HR department notifies IT of an employee’s resignation or termination and last date of employment, so the departing employee’s login credentials and access rights to company computers, email, and other information systems are deactivated prior to or at the time of departure.
  • Have and use an exit interview process to identify and retrieve from a departing employee all company equipment, files, and information (which may be proprietary company information or personal information about other employees or customers). If there is advance notice of the employee’s resignation or termination, advance planning may be appropriate to assess any anticipated logistical difficulties, such as timely retrieval of equipment or files the employee used at home.
  • Follow up on or before the date of departure to make sure the departing employee returned all company equipment and portable devices and retrieved, returned, or destroyed all company information on any personal equipment or portable device. Requesting that the employee sign a certification to that effect may be appropriate.
  • Upon retrieving a departing employee’s equipment and records, review the material to determine whether any information or records must be preserved pursuant to the organization’s records management program or an active legal hold. After taking appropriate preservation steps, dispose of information securely (the methods of disposal may be dictated by law). Ensure that portable devices returned by the departing employee are wiped prior to reissuing the devices to other employees.
  • Use the exit interview process to remind departing employees of their obligations to maintain confidentiality and to return company property and information (which should have been included in policies, personnel manuals, and employment agreements). You also may want to inquire about new employment a departing employee has obtained or is seeking, and assess whether there is any risk that company information may be taken by the employee upon departure. If so, it may be appropriate to terminate access or eliminate “write” capabilities. If there are any indications of possible misappropriation after departure, consult legal counsel regarding an appropriate response and a possible IT forensic investigation.
  • Employees’ access rights to company information and systems should be limited and carefully delineated based on individual roles and responsibilities. In the context of departures, this delineation can help establish that departing employees who may access and copy company information are doing so without authorization.
  • Actively review employees’ access authorizations on a regular basis to make sure departed employees’ access rights were effectively terminated. Periodic reviews also help ensure that access rights of employees whose roles may have changed are adjusted accordingly.

Having these procedures in place and following them, both before and after notice of an employee’s resignation or termination, should be an essential component of any company’s information security program. The attorneys in our Privacy and Information Security Practice can help you develop a comprehensive strategy to address these and other aspects of your information security program.  

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Louis has over 20 years of experience in cases for companies and individuals involving non-compete covenants, trade secrets and other matters associated with departing employees. He has obtained restraining orders and injunctions in numerous cases to prevent departing employees from violating non-compete agreements, diverting customer relationships and misappropriating trade secrets. Louis advises clients on using non-compete covenants in employment contracts and other business agreements, as well as a wide variety of other strategies for protection of key employees, customer relationships...

919-783-2810

About the Author

Partner

Elizabeth’s practice focuses on privacy, information security, and records management. Her comprehensive, practical approach to privacy law is reflected by the diversity of her clients, which hail from a variety of industries including health care, financial services, insurance, retail, telecom, utility, technology, consumer goods and client services. Elizabeth has also worked with organizations of various size and scope, ranging from Fortune 100 companies with international reach to local charities.  She was listed among the top privacy professionals in Computerworld’s...

919.783.2971

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.