Advertisement

April 24, 2014

Will the Decision Invalidating the NLRB Recess Appointments Change the NLRB’s View Towards Employee Use of Social Media

As was widely reported, on January 25, 2013, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit struck down President Obama’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).  The members who were found to have been appointed under an unconstitutional exercise of executive power were Sharon Block, Terence F. Flynn and Richard E. Griffin.  One of the questions raised by this decision is whether the NLRB’s policy towards employee use of social media will change.  In the last couple of years, the NLRB has issued numerous rulings, primarily by its administrative law judges, as well as issuing three widely-read reports from it General Counsel’s office addressing social media policies and the application of those policies.  These rulings and reports have almost universally taken the position that any employment policy that can be construed to limit communications between co-workers discussing the terms and conditions of employment is unlawful.  For example, the NLRB Board this past September struck down a rule prohibiting employees from electronically posting statements that damage the Company or damage any persons reputation because, read broadly, the policy prohibited negative statements about how the company treated its employees.

Even if the Board cannot continue under its current composition, it is unlikely that there will be any changes to the NLRB’s view regarding social media.  The General Counsel’s office has made plain its position that the internet should be viewed a place for employees to communicate about the workplace, including making complaints about their employer.  Additionally, if President Obama is compelled to appoint new members to the NLRB Board, any new appointees will almost certainly contain similar views about the workplace and employment rules.  In short, it is difficult to believe that the NLRB will have a change of position in its view of employee use of social media and employers should continue to bear this in mind in both policy and practice.

©2014 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

Eric B. Sigda is a shareholder in Greenberg Traurig’s Labor & Employment Practice. His represents management in litigating federal and state employment matters including claims involving allegations of discrimination, harassment, whistleblowing, Sarbanes-Oxley retaliation, breach of contract, wage and hour class actions, misappropriation of trade secrets and violations of restrictive covenants. Eric has handled matters in federal and state courts and in arbitration. He has also represented clients before various agencies including the Equal Employment Opportunity...

212-801-9386

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.