Advertisement

May 25, 2013

Wisconsin Act 255 Tax Credit Changes in 2011

As companies franticly scramble to get all of their ducks in a row before the clock strikes midnight on December 31st, including doling out any remaining Act 255 Tax Credits, perhaps we should take a minute to recap the upcoming changes to the credits, and discuss what investors can expect as we move into 2011.

Tax Credit Limitation Increases

The first big change involves the current tax credit limitations.  Assuming a company has been approved by the Wisconsin Department of Commerce (the “Department”) as a Qualified New Business Venture (“QNBV”), such company can now take up to $8,000,000 in qualified investments.  Such limitation is double the current limit of $4,000,000.  In other words, a QNBV may now qualify for tax credits for up to $8,000,000 of funding it receives.  Given the state of the economy, this will likely aid many existing companies who must now go back to investors to ask for additional money.

Another limitation increase allows angel investors to invest substantially more money in QNBVs annually.  Currently, there is a maximum of $5,500,000 allowed.  Starting on January 1st, that limit goes up to $18,000,000; meaning an angel investor can invest up to that amount in QNBVs and receive tax credits assuming the portfolio companies have credits to allocate.  It is important to note that there will be an additional $250,000 of tax credits available for investments in nanotechnology businesses.

A similar limitation increase is provided to fund managers.  Instead of the current $6,000,000 maximum annual investment, fund managers may now invest up to $18,500,000 annually.  An additional $250,000 tax credit is also available for investments made in nanotechnology businesses.

Capital Gains

If the increases in tax credit limitations are the ice cream sundae, perhaps the Governor’s latest announcement is the cherry on the top.  Beginning January 1, 2011, investors with long-term capital gains will be able to subtract such gains from their federal adjusted gross income, assuming they are able to clear a few low hurdles.  Similar to the Act 255 Tax Credits, the Department must approve a business as a QNBV Cap Gains Company.  The definition for the Cap Gains Companies is broader than the original QNBV definition so as to allow more companies to qualify.

After a company is qualified under this program, it may seek out investors who are looking to ditch up to an aggregate of $10,000,000 of long-term capital gains per year.  The process goes as follows: the investor sells the assets which provide the long-term capital gain; the investor must then deposit such gain into a segregated account in a financial institution; within 180 days of the sale, the investor must invest ALL OF THE PROCEEDS in a QNBV Cap Gains Company; and then the investor must notify the Wisconsin Department of Revenue that it will not be declaring that gain on its income tax return.  What a great way to say Happy Holidays to the Department of Revenue.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Melissa M. Turczyn Attorney Michael Best Friedrich Law Firm
Associate

Melissa Turczyn is a member of the Business Law Practice Group and a member of the VentureBestSM Team. Ms. Turczyn is also a member of the firm’s Renewable Energy and Stimulus Legislation Teams.

608-257-7484

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.