Advertisement

June 20, 2013

Wisconsin DNR’s New Phosphorus Rules: Update – They Are in Effect

In May we reported that the new phosphorus rules for point sources adopted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (“WDNR”) had gone into effect on December 1, 2010, but might not remain in effect for long. The expectation at that time was that the Governor’s Biennial Budget bill would include a two-year delay in the effective date of the rules. See our May 9, 2011 client alert Wisconsin DNR’s New Phosphorus Rules: Are They in Effect?

It never happened. 

The Governor’s original budget proposal prohibited WDNR from promulgating or enforcing phosphorus rules more stringent than those established in the neighboring states of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota or Ohio. That proposal met with much concern and the talked-about alternative was to enact the two-year delay. The Joint Committee on Finance considered various options presented by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau.  Reportedly, the Senate and Assembly Republicans couldn’t agree on any of the delay options, and chose instead to delete the Governor’s proposal.  As a result, the Biennial Budget bill signed by Governor Walker on June 26, 2011 contained no language on the issue – leaving the adopted rules in place.

Now the talk is about a separate piece of legislation. Since the legislative session is now over, this will have to wait at least until September when the new session opens. What the legislation might say is yet to be determined.

So, the work begins in earnest to implement the rules. There are lots of procedural and substantive issues to address and WDNR is working with outside groups to identify those issues and fashion responses which will form the basis for WDNR guidance.   

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

linda h, bochert, partner, michael best law firm
Partner

As a partner in the firm’s Land and Resources Practice Group, Linda Bochert helps her clients establish and maintain effective working relationships with state and federal environmental regulatory agencies. She serves in various policy advisory roles to state agencies, including the Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Revenue. Her clients benefit from her unique understanding of the workings of regulatory agencies and her ability to develop mutually beneficial solutions to regulatory issues. Ms. Bochert also co-chairs our firmwide Sustainability Initiative.

608-283-2271

About the Author

David A. Crass agribusiness law attorney Michael best Law Firm
Partner

David Crass is chair of the firm's Agribusiness, Food Processing and Distribution Group, a leader in the firm's Renewable Energy practice and a member of the firm’s Management Committee. Mr. Crass has served as the Managing Partner of the firm's Madison Office (2005-2008) and as chair of the firm's Land and Resources Practice Group (2003-2005). He focuses his practice primarily in the areas of environmental and energy law, climate change counseling, agricultural and food industries and renewable energy project development. Mr. Crass has represented clients in a...

608.283.2267

Contributors

Anna J. WIldeman Michael Best Friedrich Attorney Law Firm
Associate

Anna Wildeman is a member of the Land and Resources Practice Group and the Agribusiness, Food Processing & Distribution Group in the Madison office. Her practice focuses on environmental, administrative and energy law, issues related to climate change, agriculture and renewable energy. Ms Wildeman has assisted both buyers and sellers in assessing environmental issues in real estate and corporate transactions and has been actively involved in securing state and local permits for a number of projects throughout Wisconsin.

608-283-0109

About the Author

Leah Hurtgen Ziemba Associate Michael Best and Friedrich
Associate

Leah Hurtgen Ziemba is an associate in the Madison office of Michael Best and a member of the Energy and Sustainability Industry Group and Agribusiness, Food Processing and Distribution Group.

608-283-4420

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.