May 25, 2012

Wisconsin Healthcare “Apology Bill” Scheduled for Assembly Vote Tomorrow

On Tuesday October 25th, the Wisconsin Assembly is scheduled to vote on AB 147.  The bill provides that a statement or conduct of a health care provider or a provider’s agent or employee that expresses apology, benevolence, compassion, condolence, fault, liability, remorse, responsibility, or sympathy to a patient or patient’s relative or representative is not admissible into evidence or subject to discovery as evidence of liability or as an admission against interest in any civil action or administrative hearing regarding the health care provider.  The bill had been advanced by the Assembly Committee on Health on a vote of 7-3.

The companion bill, SB 103, was passed out of the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations on a vote of 3-2.  It has not yet been scheduled for a floor vote.

Advocates for the bill indicate that the bill will encourage open and honest communication between the health care providers and their patients, and will encourage providers to offer heartfelt statements of concern or apology without a fear that those statements will be used against them in litigation. 

Some critics of the bill contend that it goes too far.  For example, the State Bar Litigation Section supports an amendment that would made expressions of apology, benevolence, compassion, condolence, remorse, or sympathy inadmissible; but statements expressing fault, liability and responsibility would remain admissible.

The Health Law team at von Briesen will continue to monitor the progress of Assembly Bill 147, including the bill’s vote in the Assembly and its progress in the Senate. 

©2012 von Briesen & Roper, s.c

About the Author

Shareholder

Diane Welsh is a shareholder in the Health Care Practice Group and the Litigation Practice Group. Diane chairs the Government Relations and Regulatory Law Section and is also a member of the firm’s Strategic Risk and Crisis Management Team.

(608) 661-3961

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.