Advertisement

May 24, 2013

Workers Say Safety Is Paramount

Hang out around the water cooler at any office long enough and you will undoubtedly hear someone complain about their lack of pay, vacation time or sick days. But while those issues might be discussed more often, they are not the most important labor issue to employees. It turns out that-overwhelmingly-safety is the chief concern of employees, with 85% ranking it as their top concern.

Based on numerous surveys and polls by the University of Chicago's National Opinion Research Center, more workers feel that safety is "very important," than family and maternity leave (cited by 78%), minimum wage (70%), paid sick days (69%), overtime pay (69%), maximum hour limits (46%) and the right to join a union (43%). If employees put an emphasis on safety, it would probably be wise for employers to as well. And on the whole, people do feel that their workplaces are safe. (Up to 90% believe that management prioritizes safety.)

Still, improvements can be made and the report concludes that "the lack of serious attention to the problem of workplace safety is underscored by the stark shortcomings in the existing regulatory system. Under the present regulatory set-up, it is impossible to come close to enforcing even the current safety standards." It seems, then, that further improvement will have to come from the ground up instead of the top down.

__________

Jared Wade is senior editor of Risk Management.

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2013 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Senior Editor

Jared Wade is the senior editor of Risk Management magazine and the Risk Management Monitor blog.

212-655-5919

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.