May 25, 2012

You Can “Just Say No” To Weapons At Your Facility

 

There is NO constitutional right under the U.S. or North Carolina Constitutions for any person to possess a firearm or other weapon on the campus of your assisted living community or nursing facility. That means that you can develop, implement and enforce facility policies preventing residents from having guns or other weapons in the facility and in their rooms or living units.
The recent tragic shootings at long term care facilities around the U.S. and in North Carolina have brought this issue to the forefront, prompting some residents to insist they have a right to weapons because your facility is their home. It this true? It is not. In the same way the owner of a private apartment complex can preclude weapons possession or use on site, so can the owner/operator of a long term care facility.
Several high profile court cases and political campaigns focusing on the Constitutional right to bear arms have created the notion among many that no individual has the right to restrict another person’s possession or use of a gun for legal purposes. This is incorrect. The U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of the people’s right to bear arms is found in the Second Amendment to the Constitution. It’s reach is limited in that it only prevents the Government from infringing on a citizen’s right to possess guns for legal purposes. It does not reach private action by private persons, including those who operate residential or health care facilities.
So you can “just say no” to the possession or use of firearms or other weapons on your long term care facility campus. If this is your policy, it should be committed to writing and residents should be informed of this at or before admission.
A simply policy is all you need to enforce this restriction. One that we recently drafted reads as follows:

No person, including residents or family members, may possess or carry, whether openly or concealed, any guns, rifles, pistols, or firearms of any type on the premises of _____________________________ (name of facility or property). Violation of this policy shall be deemed a violation of the applicable rental agreement or admission agreement and may constitute grounds for discharge or cancellation of the resident admission or rental agreement.

If you prefer a policy that is broader and addresses firearms and other types of weapons, below is sample language taken, in part, from existing North Carolina statutes prohibiting weapons on school grounds, liquor stores, and other public places:

No person, including residents or family members, may possess or carry, whether openly or concealed, any guns, rifles, pistols, or firearms of any type, stun guns, air rifles, air pistols, Bowie Knives, dirks, daggers, slingshots, loaded canes, switchblade knives, blackjacks, metallic knuckles, razors or razor blades (except solely for personal shaving), fireworks, or any sharp pointed or edged instrument (except instructional supplies, un-altered nail files and clippers, and tools used solely for the preparation of food, instruction, and maintenance on the property) on the premises of _____________________________ (name of facility or property). Violation of this policy shall be deemed a violation of the applicable rental agreement or admission agreement and may constitute grounds for discharge or cancellation of the resident admission or rental agreement.

 

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Ken is a long term care attorney advising clients on a wide variety of legal planning issues arising in the skilled nursing facility setting, assisted living setting, and other spheres of long term care. He is a frequent national lecturer and author of industry manuals, national trade journal magazine articles and similar training tools. He serves Poyner Spruill clients by focusing on legal issues impacting the long term care and health services sector. Ken also serves as head of Poyner Spruill's Health Law Section.

Representative Experience

  • Served...
(919) 783-2917

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.