Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Your Imported Aluminum Parts May Be Subject to Over 400% Duty

Due to the breadth of the antidumping (AD) and countervailing (CVD) duty orders on aluminum extrusions from China, many importers, although they initially imported their aluminum parts without AD and CVD cash deposits, are finding that their aluminum parts are being subjected to AD and CVD cash deposits of over 400 percent.  As explained below, importers have the opportunity this month to initiate a strategy to reduce their liability for these potential crippling duties.  

Background

In May 2011, the Department of Commerce (DOC) and the International Trade Commission finished their AD and CVD investigation of imports of aluminum extrusions from China.  As a result of the investigations, DOC required almost all importers of aluminum extrusions to post: (1) AD cash deposits of approximately 33 percent, and (2) CVD cash deposits of 374 percent.

Scope of the Orders

Since that time, many importers have submitted scope determinations to see whether their products are included within the scope of the AD and CVD cases.  The reason is that the scope of the case is quite broad and covers many goods that importers did not believe were covered.  Essentially, any part that was made from an aluminum extrusion in China is covered unless it is subject to one of the exclusions.

Finished Goods and Kits Exclusions

Many companies believe that their products were exempt based on the “finished merchandise” and ”finished kit” exclusions.  However, DOC has interpreted these exclusions very narrowly and almost all products that they have examined have been determined by DOC to be within the scope.

  • Although many products may be sold to retailers as finished parts, DOC has found that if they are incorporated into some larger product, then they do not qualify for the finished merchandise exclusion.  For example, DOC found that, although an importer may sell fence posts as a stand-alone product, the fact that they are used to produce a fencing system means that they are not finished merchandise.  
  • In addition, DOC has taken a very stringent view of what constitutes a finished goods kit.  For example, although drapery rail kits are sold independently to retailers, DOC found that they are not finished goods kits because they did not include draperies.

Customs Investigations

Many companies have entered aluminum parts without AD or CVD cash deposits because
they did not realize they were included within the scope.  Customs knows this and is aggressively investigating whether importers’ products are included in the scope of the AD and CVD orders.  We know of several on-going investigations.  Therefore, it is prudent for companies that import products containing aluminum to use due diligence to determine whether their parts are included with the scope of the AD and CVD orders.

Reducing Your Liability

400 percent AD and CVD duties are significant by any measure.  If you determine that your products are covered by the scope of the AD and CVD orders, you can reduce your liability by having your Chinese supplier participate in the upcoming administrative reviews.  Almost all of the companies will have to supply very little information.  Therefore, the burden, along with the legal fees to participate, is not high.  However, the deadline for participating is the end of May 2012. 

©2013 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

Partner

Doug has a broad-based practice in customs and international trade that includes actively litigating antidumping duty, countervailing duty and safeguard cases for over 25 years. He represents foreign companies in Canada, Europe, Japan and Mexico, as well as domestic producers in industries that range from high-tech to heavy industry, and from consumer to industrial goods. He also represents trade associations, government agencies and embassies in a broad range of matters.
 

202-230-5802

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.