Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Is your Neighbor’s Dock on your Bottomlands? Equitably Apportioning Riparian Rights.

Owners of waterfront property often forego a large yard in favor of being on the water. Many of the areas around Michigan's inland lakes were platted in the early part of the last century, when zoning codes were much less restrictive or non-existent. Though likely adequate for the small seasonal cottages of the time, many of those lots are now occupied by large modern homes or cottages. The small dock that accommodated a rowboat is now flanked by a ski boat, pontoon and personal watercraft. Especially in times of low lake levels, things on the water become crowded and neighbor is pitted against neighbor. In some areas, there is a race to get docks installed in the spring, though bottomlands are not prorated on a first come first served basis.

Those who own land on an inland lake in Michigan also own the submerged lands or "bottomlands" adjacent to their property, to the middle of the lake. Among other rights, a riparian owner has the exclusive right to erect a dock and permanently moor boats on his or her riparian bottomlands. Encroaching onto your neighbor's bottomlands is a trespass, much like the unauthorized entry into his yard. Though surveys are readily available to determine the extent of upland ownership, very few lakes have been the subject of a riparian bottomlands survey and in even fewer cases have those boundaries been established by a circuit court judge.

It is a simple matter to apportion bottomlands on a lake which is a perfect circle. Lines are drawn from the landward terminus points of each property line to a point in the center of the lake. Of course, few if any lakes are perfect circles. Michigan courts have developed allocation formulas with the goal of equitably apportioning riparian rights to the respective riparian owners, based on the amount of lake frontage (acreage is irrelevant) owned by each. Though one can start with the "eyeball" test, the services of a surveyor experienced in riparian bottomland surveys will likely be required.

People often purchase lakefront property for the peace and tranquility it offers, and may be inclined to ignore encroachments by a neighbor. Unfortunately, looking the other way could cause you to permanently lose your property by virtue of adverse possession or a prescriptive easement claim. At a minimum, if you believe that a neighbor is encroaching onto either your upland or bottomlands, you should consider whether a written license agreement may be appropriate to prevent such future claims. Counsel experienced in this area can provide direction as to what may be appropriate in your individual circumstances.

© 2013 Varnum LLP

About the Author

Partner

A partner in Varnum's trial group, Eric represents individuals, associations and business clients in lawsuits involving contract disputes, quiet title actions and other civil disputes. He has extensive experience in real estate matters, including construction law, riparian rights, boundary disputes, zoning and land use issues. Eric's practice also includes disputes involving closely-held businesses including...

269/553-3506

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.