September 7, 2010

Albert Jacobs, Jr.

  • 212-704-6086
  • albert.jacobs@troutmansanders.com
  • www.troutmansanders.com
  • With more than 30 years of experience in patent law, Mr. Jacobs concentrates his practice in the areas of life sciences, especially pharmaceutical and biotechnology, medical, chemical and health care, as well as chemical, business method intellectual property law and litigation. He has extensive experience in obtaining original patents, as well as re-issue patents and those submitted for re-examination and has been responsible for obtaining patents on commercially valuable products and systems. The majority of Mr. Jacobs’ practice over the past 20 years has been in litigation involving patents infringed by third parties and defending clients charged with infringement by patent owners. He also counsels clients on issues of infringement and validity and global patent portfolio management.

    In addition, Mr. Jacobs has extensive experience in intellectual property cases before the International Trade Commission. He has also successfully represented semiconductors and business method patent litigation, both at the trial level and at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) and has successfully reversed several Markman rulings for his clients. He also has regularly lectured on and advised clients on the nature and enforcement of intellectual property rights in the People’s Republic of China as well as explaining U.S. IPR enforcement to the Chinese government and to Chinese companies and law firms.

  • Troutman Sanders LLP

Articles in the National Law Review database by Albert Jacobs, Jr.:

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to NLR’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using this site. The content and links on this site are intended for general information purposes only. Such information and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and this website. If you require legal or professional advice for your specific situation, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review (“NLR”) is not a law firm nor is the NLR website intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.