Advertisement

May 19, 2013

Albert Jacobs, Jr.

  • 212-704-6086
  • albert.jacobs@troutmansanders.com
  • www.troutmansanders.com
  • With more than 30 years of experience in patent law, Mr. Jacobs concentrates his practice in the areas of life sciences, especially pharmaceutical and biotechnology, medical, chemical and health care, as well as chemical, business method intellectual property law and litigation. He has extensive experience in obtaining original patents, as well as re-issue patents and those submitted for re-examination and has been responsible for obtaining patents on commercially valuable products and systems. The majority of Mr. Jacobs’ practice over the past 20 years has been in litigation involving patents infringed by third parties and defending clients charged with infringement by patent owners. He also counsels clients on issues of infringement and validity and global patent portfolio management.

    In addition, Mr. Jacobs has extensive experience in intellectual property cases before the International Trade Commission. He has also successfully represented semiconductors and business method patent litigation, both at the trial level and at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) and has successfully reversed several Markman rulings for his clients. He also has regularly lectured on and advised clients on the nature and enforcement of intellectual property rights in the People’s Republic of China as well as explaining U.S. IPR enforcement to the Chinese government and to Chinese companies and law firms.

  • Troutman Sanders LLP

Articles in the National Law Review database by Albert Jacobs, Jr.:

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the