Advertisement

May 23, 2013

Howard J. Shire , Partner

  • 212.908.6205
  • hshire@kenyon.com
  • www.kenyon.com
  • With more than 30 years’ experience, Howard J. Shire is a skillful litigator who successfully protects and defends his clients’ products and IP rights against infringement. Examples include his successful representation of Toyota as defendant in a well known trademark dilution and infringement case involving the LEXUS mark; his spearheading a trademark and copyright counterfeiting case for MuscleTech, a leading nutritional supplement company, which resulted in a multi-million dollar judgment and criminal indictments and convictions brought by the U.S. Attorney; his successful representation of BASF Corporation in a trade dress litigation, which at the time established the Ninth Circuit’s rule that a single color is not generally protectable under the U.S. Trademark Act; his role on behalf of Heidelberg Harris in a case that resulted in a jury verdict of infringement of two printing press patents and a multi-million dollar damages award for Harris; his representing Ozzy Osbourne in a litigation concerning ownership of the well known Black Sabbath trademark. WTR 1000, which ranks trademark attorneys worldwide, acknowledges Mr. Shire as “the go-to trademark attorney” at the firm, especially for litigations, describing him as a “tenacious litigator” with “particular skill in the courtroom.”

  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP

Articles in the National Law Review database by Howard J. Shire :

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.