May 25, 2012

J. Brett Busby, Partner

  • 713.221.1160
  • brett.busby@bgllp.com
  • www.bgllp.com
  • Brett Busby is an experienced appellate and trial partner who has presented oral argument before the United States Supreme Court and briefed several cases there, including the landmark securities case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Mr. Busby has also argued before the Texas Supreme Court and the federal and Texas courts of appeals, and he has briefed dozens of cases in federal and state courts at both the appellate and trial level.

    Mr. Busby also specializes in helping clients develop cost-effective strategies for managing risk at all stages of the litigation process. He frequently works with trial counsel to determine pre-trial strategy, prepare dispositive motions, preserve error, and craft the jury charge, and he serves as a member of the Texas Bar Committee on Pattern Jury Charges. He is also an adjunct professor at the University of Texas School of Law, where he co-teaches the U.S. Supreme Court Clinic.

    Before entering private practice, Mr. Busby served as a law clerk to the Honorable Byron R. White (Ret.) and Honorable John Paul Stevens, U.S. Supreme Court, and to the Honorable Gerald Bard Tjoflat, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

  • Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

Articles in the National Law Review database by J. Brett Busby:

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.