May 25, 2012

M. Todd Sullivan

  • 919-755-2159
  • tsullivan@wcsr.com
  • www.wcsr.com

  • Todd has a national practice focused on issues of employment agreements and employee departures, including the litigation of injunction and damages cases related to covenants not to compete, nonsolicitation and nondisclosure covenants, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets, duty of loyalty, employee raiding, the federal Economic Espionage Act and Computer Fraud & Abuse Act, the inevitable disclosure doctrine, and varied state statutes and ancillary claims.

    Todd has litigated over 100 employee defection matters in numerous state and federal courts and arbitral forums. Among the clients Todd has litigated employee defection matters for are Armacell LLC, Aventis Crop Science, BB&T, ClearChannel Communications, General Dynamics, Patterson Dental, Raymond James & Associates, RF Micro Devices, Richard Childress Racing, Robert Half International and Syngenta Biotechnology.

    In addition to his litigation practice, Todd routinely drafts – and assists others in drafting – employment agreements containing restrictive covenants and works closely with clients in identifying and protecting competitively valuable assets and resources. Todd is frequently a go-to resource for Womble Carlyle’s Corporate & Securities and Intellectual Property attorneys in identifying and protecting client assets in these areas, as well.

    Todd is a trusted authority on various legal issues involving employer/employee disputes and is a frequent lecturer on these topics, including recent presentations for Wake Forest University School of Law and The University of North Carolina’s Kenan-Flagler Business School.

  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC

Articles in the National Law Review database by M. Todd Sullivan:

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.