Advertisement

Mark D. Kemple , Shareholder

Phone: 310.586.7864
Email: kemplem@gtlaw.com
Website: www.gtlaw.com
Professional Biography:
Mark Kemple is a litigator with broad trial experience in many areas of the law, including employment class and individual litigation, consumer class litigation, and other commercial disputes. Apart from trial work, Mark focuses on the defense of wage and hour class actions and has wide experience in unfair competition and consumer protection actions — topics which he has spoken on in a variety of forums.

Mark has handled disputes for companies of all sizes and has tried numerous lawsuits and arbitrations throughout the United States as well as argued appeals in three federal circuits and several state courts of appeal. For instance, Mark has been counsel of record in recent years for General Electric, PepsiCo, California Pizza Kitchen, Panda Restaurant Group, Wendy’s International, Mentor Corporation, McDonald’s Corporation, Washington Group International, Verizon Wireless, Verizon Communications, Inc., Trammell Crow Company, Boston Market Corporation, and the Los Angeles Unified School District, among other entities.
Organization: Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Articles in the National Law Review database by Mark D. Kemple :

California Supreme Court’s Kirby Decision: If Money Talks, is This Another Post-Brinker Blow to Meal and Rest Period Claims? (Posted On Thu, 2012-05-10 04:12)
Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Ct.: The Takeaway on Meal and Rest Period Rules and Claims (Posted On Fri, 2012-04-13 22:46)

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.