Nicole Kardell, Associate

Phone: 202-524-4140
Email: nkardell@ifrahlaw.com
Website: www.ifrahlaw.com
Professional Biography:
From federal and state enforcement actions to government contract work, Nicole has spent most of her time as a lawyer representing clients on the opposite side of the table of government regulators and prosecutors. She has worked on matters involving the Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, Internal Revenue Service, Offices of Inspector General of several federal agencies, and Attorneys General of numerous states. Nicole also has worked on many matters in which clients have proactively opposed government action – before administrative as well as judicial bodies. Where necessary, she has taken policy issues to congressional offices and committees.
Organization: Ifrah Law

Articles in the National Law Review database by Nicole Kardell:

Obama’s Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights: Less Than Meets the Eye? (Posted On Friday, May 25, 2012)
Why POM Wonderful Can Celebrate FTC Judge’s Ruling in Advertising Case (Posted On Thursday, May 24, 2012)
In Nutella Advertising Case, Whom Is the System Protecting? (Posted On Monday, May 14, 2012)
CISPA, Approved by House, Poses Threat to Internet Freedom (Posted On Monday, April 30, 2012)
Second Circuit YouTube Ruling Will Have Major Impact for Online-Piracy Debate (Posted On Tuesday, April 10, 2012)
Grassley’s Case Against DOJ Stance on Financial Fraud Is Vastly Overstated (Posted On Tuesday, April 10, 2012)
App Industry Begins to Regulate Itself on Data Privacy – With Nudge From Government (Posted On Thursday, March 22, 2012)
DOJ Goes After Smaller Fraudsters, Lets Big Fish Escape (Posted On Monday, March 5, 2012)
New Agency Scrutinizes ‘Larger Participants’ in Financial Industry – But Who Are They? (Posted On Tuesday, February 28, 2012)
Developers of New Apps Need to Consider Privacy Issues (Posted On Friday, February 24, 2012)
EPIC Unlikely to Prevail in Challenge to FTC Stance on Google Privacy (Posted On Thursday, February 23, 2012)
Better Anti-Piracy Bill Introduced in Wake of SOPA, PIPA (Posted On Monday, February 13, 2012)
New Google Policy Reminds Us All of Trade-Off Between Privacy and Efficiency (Posted On Tuesday, February 7, 2012)
FTC Enlists Surprising Watchdogs to Police Marketers’ Practices (Posted On Friday, February 3, 2012)
Online Protests Hit Hard Against Anti-Piracy Bills (Posted On Saturday, January 21, 2012)
Will Facebook Become a Key Player in U.S. Online Gaming? (Posted On Thursday, January 12, 2012)
HCG-Based Diet Marketers Face Hot Pursuit by FDA, FTC (Posted On Monday, January 9, 2012)
Protests Mount Against Proposed Law That Would Cripple the Internet (Posted On Tuesday, January 3, 2012)
Judges’ New Scrutiny of Settlements May Make Life Difficult for Defendants (Posted On Sunday, January 1, 2012)
FTC Will Propose Broader Children’s Online Privacy Safeguards (Posted On Thursday, December 22, 2011)
Self-Regulation Reigns, for Now, on Consumer Data Privacy Issues (Posted On Wednesday, December 7, 2011)
Google, Microsoft Assume Roles of Judge, Jury and Executioner on the Web (Posted On Tuesday, December 6, 2011)

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

Nicole Kardell, Associate

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Search the National Law Review Database

National Law Review Keyword Search

Recent Contributions

Legal Disclaimer