February 7, 2012

Stephanie L. Haas

  • 312-759-1930
  • stephanie.haas@troutmansanders.com
  • www.troutmansanders.com

  • Stephanie focuses her practice on complex insurance coverage litigation and general commercial litigation matters. She has significant experience representing insurers in coverage disputes involving long-tail exposure including asbestos and environmental claims.

    Representative Experience

    Regularly counsels clients with respect to underlying claims involving complex insurance coverage issues, including the nature and extent of the duty to defend; “targeted tender”; trigger of coverage; allocation; potential bad faith claims; responding to settlement demands; policyholder and other insurer insolvencies; late notice; number of occurrences; and breach of cooperation.

    Reduced tens of thousands of asbestos bodily injury claims spanning many years to a single occurrence in the coverage case, John Crane, Inc .v. Admiral Ins. Co., et al.

    Successfully represented an insurer against a Fortune 200 company in a lawsuit concerning dozens of sites spanning over 20 years of insurance coverage.

    Obtained advantageous settlements for insurance carriers in several matters involving underlying torts, including claims alleged not to be subject to aggregate limits under the products/completed operations hazard.

    Counseled client on various coverage issues related to nationwide clergy sexual abuse claims.

  • Troutman Sanders LLP

Articles in the National Law Review database by Stephanie L. Haas :

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.