Advertisement

2013 Trademark Webinar Series - Gray Market Goods and Parallel Imports: Legal and Business Considerations for a Gray Area of Law

Mar

20

Click Here For Registration Information

Webinar Hosted By: Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Wednesday, March 20, 2013 - 12:00pm - 1:00pm

Topics and Jurisdictions: Administrative & Regulatory / Antitrust & Trade Regulation / Intellectual Property

All Federal

: Printer-friendly; Email this Article; Download PDF; Tweet

Gray Market Goods and Parallel Imports: Legal and Business Considerations for a Gray Area of Law

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Time: 12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m. Central Time • Location: Live webinar

Gray market goods are products made or authorized by a U.S. trademark or copyright owner that bear the owner’s trademark or include a copyrighted work, but are not intended for sale in the U.S. Due to differences in manufacturing costs between the U.S. and foreign countries, an incentive exists for the cheaper foreign-made goods to be imported into the U.S., often against the wishes of the U.S. trademark or copyright owner. This program discusses the legal and business considerations for combatting and engaging in the commerce of gray market goods, including the implications of the soon-to-be-decided Supreme Court case entitled Supap Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (No. 11-697) (argued October 29, 2012).

Presented by: Larry Saret and Michelle Kouba

Kindly respond by Friday, March 15

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.