- Primary menu
- Home
- Publish With Us
- Contributors
- About Us
- Contact Us
- Advertise
- Sign Up For NLR Bulletins
- QUICK LINKS
- Antitrust Law
- |
- Bankruptcy & Restructuring
- |
- Biotech & Cleantech
- |
- Business of Law
- |
- Election
- Construction & Real Estate
- |
- Environmental, Energy & Resources
- |
- Financial, Securities & Banking
- Health Care
- |
- Immigration
- |
- IP Law
- |
- Insurance
- |
- Labor & Employment
- |
- Litigation
- |
- Media & FCC
- |
- Tax
Life Sciences and Litigation
|
Webinar
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Wednesday, March 13, 2013 - 12:00pm - 1:00pm
Administrative & Regulatory / Biotech & Cleantech / Health Law & Managed Care / Intellectual Property / Litigation / Trial Practice
All Federal
|
Life Sciences and Litigation
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Time: 12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m. Central Time
Location: Live webinar
In this session, we will provide an analysis and review of most recent case law relating to life sciences issues. The presentation is geared toward in-house counsel, IP agents, and other in-house staff involved with life sciences IP litigation.
Presented by: John C. Scheller and Kenneth M. Albridge III
Kindly respond by Friday, March 8
There is no charge to participate. We will apply for CLE credit for Wisconsin and Illinois only.
For questions or more information, please contact Rachel Kuklinski at 414.277.3452.
© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLPRelated Articles
- As Summer Winds Down, Patent Law Heats Up
- Allergan V. Sandoz – When Everything “Old” Is “New” Again Re: Patent Law Litigation
- The Patentability of Isolated DNA Will be Decided by the Supreme Court
- The Federal Circuit’s Recent “Safe Harbor” Ruling Could Impact Biosimilars Drug Development
- Federal Circuit Reaffirms the Patentability of Isolated DNA in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad
- Akamai/McKesson Decided– Implications for Personalized Medicine Patents
- Adjusting the Inequitable Conduct Doctrine: Federal Circuit Hears Oral Arguments En Banc in Therasense
- Patent Exhaustion Rejected: Patented Seed Purchaser Has No Right to Make Copies
Advertisement
Recent Contributions to the National Law Review
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
Armstrong Teasdale
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC
McDermott Will & Emery
Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS)
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
U.S. Department of Labor
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Schiff Hardin LLP
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
McDermott Will & Emery








