Advertisement

May 20, 2013

Patent Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Reading the Tea Leaves of the Supreme Court Argument


Patent Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Reading the Tea Leaves of the Supreme Court Argument

Thursday, March 28, 2013

  • 12:00 – 1:00 pm EST

To register, please click here.

McDermott Will & Emery is pleased to present another complimentary webcast in its regular "Life Sciences: Understanding Opportunities and Challenges for Improved Business Results" series.  This webcast will focus on an analysis of the oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States on Monday, March 25, 2013, in the case regarding the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s decision to uphold the settlement in the so-called Androgel case, which involved a so-called "reverse payment.”  The outcome of this case will have profound implications for both branded and generic companies as they consider whether to litigate or settle — and how to settle — "bet the company" patent litigation.

Our distinguished panel will dissect the oral argument before the Supreme Court and forecast the Court's likely analysis of the critical issues.   

McDermott Speakers 

Moderator

For more information, please contact McDermott Events.

© 2013 McDermott Will & Emery

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require