- Primary menu
- Home
- Publish With Us
- Contributors
- About Us
- Contact Us
- Advertise
- Sign Up For NLR Bulletins
- QUICK LINKS
- Antitrust Law
- |
- Bankruptcy & Restructuring
- |
- Biotech & Cleantech
- |
- Business of Law
- |
- Election
- Construction & Real Estate
- |
- Environmental, Energy & Resources
- |
- Financial, Securities & Banking
- Health Care
- |
- Immigration
- |
- IP Law
- |
- Insurance
- |
- Labor & Employment
- |
- Litigation
- |
- Media & FCC
- |
- Tax
Patent Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Reading the Tea Leaves of the Supreme Court Argument
|
Webinar
McDermott Will & Emery
Thursday, March 28, 2013 - 12:00pm - 1:00pm
Administrative & Regulatory / Health Law & Managed Care / Intellectual Property
All Federal
|
Patent Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Reading the Tea Leaves of the Supreme Court Argument
Thursday, March 28, 2013
- 12:00 – 1:00 pm EST
To register, please click here.
McDermott Will & Emery is pleased to present another complimentary webcast in its regular "Life Sciences: Understanding Opportunities and Challenges for Improved Business Results" series. This webcast will focus on an analysis of the oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States on Monday, March 25, 2013, in the case regarding the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s decision to uphold the settlement in the so-called Androgel case, which involved a so-called "reverse payment.” The outcome of this case will have profound implications for both branded and generic companies as they consider whether to litigate or settle — and how to settle — "bet the company" patent litigation.
Our distinguished panel will dissect the oral argument before the Supreme Court and forecast the Court's likely analysis of the critical issues.
McDermott Speakers
- M. Miller Baker, Partner
- Jeffrey W. Brennan, Partner, Former Head of the FTC's Health Care Division
- William G. Gaede, Partner
Moderator
- Glenn M. Engelmann, Senior Counsel, Former AstraZeneca U.S. General Counsel
For more information, please contact McDermott Events.
© 2013 McDermott Will & EmeryRelated Articles
- Understanding Compulsory Licenses in India – Part 2 of a 2-Part Series
- As Summer Winds Down, Patent Law Heats Up
- Prioritization of Examination of Patent Applications in Brazil for Pharmaceutical Products and Processes, and Devices and Equipment Related to Public Health
- Understanding Compulsory Licenses in India – Part 1 of a 2-Part Series
- What Goes Up…Must Come Down: Viagra Patent Invalidated by Canadian Supreme Court
- Allergan V. Sandoz – When Everything “Old” Is “New” Again Re: Patent Law Litigation
- To Correct Inventorship of a Patent, Go to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), Not the Federal Courts
- Can Human Genes Be Patented?
Advertisement
Recent Contributions to the National Law Review
McDermott Will & Emery
Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS)
U.S. Department of Labor
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS)
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP







