Intellectual Property Law

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
May
4
2017
PTO Litigation Report – May 4, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
4
2017
Recipes and Restaurants: Part III of “Restricting Covenant” Series Faegre Drinker
May
4
2017
Federal Circuit in Helsinn v. Teva Declines Limiting Requirements of “On Sale” Bar Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
4
2017
BRITAX Overruled - Australian Federal Court Sets Record Straight for Infringement of Innovation Patents K&L Gates
May
3
2017
Navigating the Lifecycle of an Eponymous Brand (Part 3) Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
3
2017
Supply Agreement Can Trigger On-Sale Bar Vedder Price
May
3
2017
PTO Litigation Report – May 3, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
3
2017
SCOTUS To Solve The Post-Alice Puzzle? IMS Legal Strategies
May
2
2017
Federal Circuit Clarifies AIA On-Sale Bar Provision Applies Where Existence of Sale Is Public Polsinelli PC
May
2
2017
Federal Circuit Rules That Public Sales Trigger the AIA On-Sale Bar Even If Claimed Features Are Not Publicly Disclosed Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
2
2017
PTO Litigation Report – May 2, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
2
2017
How Will The Supreme Court Choreograph The Biosimilar Patent Dance? Foley & Lardner LLP
May
1
2017
Reverse Engineered Podcast | The Intersection of Antitrust & Intellectual Property [PODCAST] McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2017
Inherency and Patent Claims Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
1
2017
PTO Litigation Report – May 1, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
1
2017
Throwing Out One Baby, but Not Two, with the Bathwater: Technology Properties Ltd. v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2017
Sandoz v. Amgen—Biosimilars at the Supreme Court—Oral Argument K&L Gates
May
1
2017
Beware of Relying on “Plain and Ordinary” Meaning McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2017
Intellectual Ventures Loses Claims Based on § 101, Collateral Estoppel, Standing McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2017
Heads Up! That’s Patentable Subject Matter: Thales Visionix Inc. v. U.S McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2017
Kardashian #Copyright Saga K&L Gates
Apr
30
2017
Texas District Court Excludes Reference to Presumption of Validity to Avoid Jury Confusion McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
29
2017
Ford Motor Company v. Versata Development Group: Bar for CBM Review Inching Higher McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
29
2017
PTAB to Petitioners: Get a Move On McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
28
2017
Settlement Agreement May Be Used as Evidence of Damages: Prism Techs. LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
28
2017
2017 Mid-Year Statistics Point to Continued Rise in IPR Petitions Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
28
2017
Prejudgment Interest Can Recover for Acts Prior to Patent Issuance McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
28
2017
Federal Circuit Rejects Board’s Understanding of Prior Art Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins