Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Sep
28
2016
Army Ammunition Goes Green and Infringement Free McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
IPR Stay Factors and Explaining Preliminary Injunction Rationale McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Generalized Common Sense Allegations Cannot Be Used to Supply Important Missing Claim Limitation McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
PTAB Must Provide Explanation in Support of Conclusory Findings McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Copyright Infringement – Plaintiff Not Required to Prove Copies Are Unauthorized McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Iron Man Composer Battles Tech Giant Sony and Ghostface Killah McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Double-Checking Alice Using Common-Sense Distinctions Between Ends and Means McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Ninth Circuit Provides a Second Look at Willful Copyright Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 28, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
28
2016
The Halo Effect: Original Halo Case Remanded to District Court to Consider New Test for Enhanced Damages McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
Inherent Disclosure Supports Priority Claim: Yeda Research and Development Co. v. Abbott GmbH and Co. Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
28
2016
EU – When Will Hyperlinks Be Unlawful? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
27
2016
Federal Circuit Allows New Evidence After Institution Armstrong Teasdale
Sep
27
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 27, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
26
2016
Vanda v. Roxane Labs. – Are Two Natural Laws Better Than One? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
26
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 26, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
25
2016
NDA Alert: Modify Your Non-Disclosure Agreements to Preserve All Remedies Under the New Federal Trade Secrets Statute ArentFox Schiff LLP
Sep
23
2016
Double Patenting Decision Delivers Bitter Pill To Antibody Patent Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
23
2016
Speaking the Language of the Trademark Office: Descriptions of Goods and Services Faegre Drinker
Sep
23
2016
Virtual Porn – Real Patent Lawsuit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
23
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 23, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
23
2016
Accelerated Examination of Patent Applications in Argentina Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
22
2016
Willfulness of Patent Infringement After Halo: Now What? Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
22
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 22, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
22
2016
In McRO, Federal Circuit Provides Further Guidance on Section 101 Mintz
Sep
21
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 21, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
21
2016
Apotex to Supreme Court: Review BPCIA 180-Day Notice Requirement Mintz
Sep
21
2016
Inherent Disclosure Satisfied Written Description Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins