Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
2
2016
Dynamic Drinkware v. National Graphics - Final Written Decision finding Asserted Reference to be Enabling IPR2014-01162 Faegre Drinker
Feb
2
2016
Federal Circuit Holds Defective Restriction Requirement Ends Patent Term Adjustment Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
2
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 2, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
1
2016
Italian Patent Box and Its (Non-) Compliance with OECD Recommendations McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
1
2016
Pfizer v. Lee: A Patent Term Adjustment Double Standard? Mintz
Feb
1
2016
Claims Strategies in Patent Applications – Matching or Varied? Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
1
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 1, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
1
2016
Inphi v. Netlist: Alternative Features Satisfy Patent Written Description Requirement for Negative Claim Limitation Mintz
Jan
31
2016
Plaintiff Secures Sweeping Jury Verdict in Hotly-Contested Patent Fight Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
30
2016
Guzman v. Hacienda Records and Recording Studio: No Appellate “Second Guessing” of Witness Credibility Determinations McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2016
Patent Trends to Watch in 2016 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
30
2016
Killer Joe Nevada, LLC v. Leaverton: Dismissal but No Fees for Innocent BitTorrent Defendant McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Party Raising “First Sale” Defense to Copyright Infringement Bears Initial Burden of Proof McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Supreme Court Decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis Industries: Potential Impact on Trademark Prosecution and Enforcement Strategies for Trademark Owners Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Jan
29
2016
IPR Survives Despite Petitioner Failure to Name All Real Parties of Interest McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Disparagement Proscription of § 2(a) Is Unconstitutional McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Massachusetts: Relating a Software Copyright Infringement Claim Back to its Source Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
29
2016
Suggestion of Control Not Enough for RPI Challenge; Nexus Matters for Commercial Success McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Global Tel*Link Corp. v. Securus Techs: Claims Unpatentable and Motion to Amend to Correct Typographical Errors Denied in Final Written Decision IPR2014-01278 Faegre Drinker
Jan
29
2016
Split Federal Circuit Upholds Constitutionality of Single PTAB Panels Rendering Both Institution & Final Written Decisions Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
29
2016
Motion to Amend in IPR Must Establish Patentability Over Prior Art from Original Prosecution McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 29, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
29
2016
Board to Petitioner: No RPI, No IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
PTAB: The Supreme Court Alice Decision Only “Clarified” the Law McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Discretion to Dismiss IPR Petition Pre-Institution McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
“Substantial Evidence” Review Dooms PTAB Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
HTC Corporation and HTC America v. Advanced Audio Devices: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claim Unpatentable IPR2014-01158 Faegre Drinker
Jan
29
2016
Late Request for Further Briefing to Supplement IPR Petition Not Allowed McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins