Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
May
21
2015
Oxford Nanopore Technologies v. University of Washington and UAB Research Foundation: Granting Joinder and Instituting Review of Second Petition by Same Party IPR2015-00057 Faegre Drinker
May
21
2015
Apotex Petitions Supreme Court to Review Therasense Standards Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
21
2015
Is It Time to Switch Gears? Enforceability of Automotive Company Employee Confidentiality Restrictions Foley & Lardner LLP
May
21
2015
Design Patent Case Digest: Kreative Power v. Monoprice Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
21
2015
LG Electronics Toshiba VIZIO and Hulu v. Straight Path IP Group: Decision on Institution IPR2015-00196 Faegre Drinker
May
21
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 21, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
21
2015
Patent Safe Harbor Applies To Supplemental New Drug Applications Foley & Lardner LLP
May
21
2015
Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Granting Institution IPR2015-00100 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2015
Ninth Circuit Rules Against Takedown of Anti-Islam Video on Copyright Grounds Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
20
2015
Apple-Samsung Trade Dress Case Demonstrates Potential Value of Design Patents Katten
May
20
2015
World Bottling Cap, LLC v. Crown Packaging Technology, Inc.: Denying Institution for Not Adequately Explaining Correspondence of Prior Art to Claims IPR2015-00296 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2015
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing CBM2014-00157 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 20, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
20
2015
Oxford Nanopore Tech. Ltd. v. Univ. of Washington and UAB Research Foundation: Granting Motion for Joinder IPR2015-00057 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2015
IBM Corp v. Intellectual Ventures: Granting Motion to File Supplemental Evidence and Request to Cross-Examine IPR2014-01385 Faegre Drinker
May
19
2015
“Restriction Requirements” Series, Part 1: Considering Restrictions When Developing A Claim Filing Strategy Mintz
May
19
2015
Medtronic v. NuVasive: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00073 Faegre Drinker
May
19
2015
The Importance of Contracts for Joint Infringement in Patent Cases Foley & Lardner LLP
May
19
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 19, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
19
2015
Marvell Semiconductor v. Intellectual Ventures: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00553 Faegre Drinker
May
19
2015
Square v. J. Carl Cooper: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00157 Faegre Drinker
May
19
2015
Actor Did Not Have Copyright Interest in Mohammed Film, Ninth Circuit Rules Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
19
2015
Don't Name Your Furniture Store After A Grocery Store Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
19
2015
What Factors Do Courts Consider in Trademark Disputes? McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
May
19
2015
Federal Circuit Finds No Direct Infringement Of Akamai Patents Foley & Lardner LLP
May
19
2015
Microsoft Google v. B.E. Technology: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00039 Faegre Drinker
May
18
2015
Additional Discovery In Inter Partes Reviews—Absolutely No Fishing Allowed Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
18
2015
There’s No Such Thing As a Free Sample Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins