Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Mar
23
2015
Kaiser Aluminum v. Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood: Decision Granting Revised Pro Hac Vice Motion IPR2014-01002 Faegre Drinker
Mar
23
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 23, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
23
2015
Target Corp. v. Destination Maternity Corp.: Granting Joinder IPR2014-00508, 509 Faegre Drinker
Mar
23
2015
New ".SUCKS" TLD Creates Dilemma for Trademark Owners Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
23
2015
One More Hurdle Cleared – Amgen’s Preliminary Injunction Motion for Filgrastim is Denied Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
23
2015
S.S. Steiner, Inc. v. John I. Haas, Inc.: Denying Institution IPR2014-01490 Faegre Drinker
Mar
23
2015
Broadcom Corp. v. Wi-Fi One, LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00602 Faegre Drinker
Mar
23
2015
California Federal Judge Finds Biosimilar Patent Procedures Optional Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
23
2015
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. v. Blue Origin LLC, Denying Institution IPR2014-01378 Faegre Drinker
Mar
23
2015
Third Party Submissions in Russia – Part 2 of an 8 Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
23
2015
Toshiba Corporation v. Optical Devices, LLC, Denying Institution IPR2014-01440 Faegre Drinker
Mar
22
2015
Priceline.com, Inc., Travelocity.com LP, and Yahoo! Inc. v. Metasearch Systems: Final Written Decision CBM2014-00001 Faegre Drinker
Mar
21
2015
Positec USA, Inc. and RW Direct, Inc. v. Black & Decker Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00502 Faegre Drinker
Mar
21
2015
District Court Rules Against Amgen’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction to Prevent Marketing of Sandoz’s Biosimilar Zarxio Mintz
Mar
20
2015
Missouri Federal Court Reminds Employers that Non-Compete Agreements are Not Automatically Assignable Jackson Lewis P.C.
Mar
20
2015
Kamada, Ltd. v. Grifols Therapeutics Inc: Denying Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00899 Faegre Drinker
Mar
19
2015
Locating Time Frames for Hypothetical Negotiation re: Patent Infringement Litigation Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
19
2015
U.S. International Trade Commission Institutes Investigation Under 100-Day Pilot Program Examining Complainant’s Standing to File Suit Mintz
Mar
19
2015
Global Initiatives to Accelerate Examination of Cleantech Patent Applications Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
19
2015
Design Patent Changes to Come with Ratification of the Geneva Act Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
19
2015
Neste Oil Oyj v. REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC: Partially Granting Motion to Exclude IPR2013-00578 Faegre Drinker
Mar
19
2015
Understanding Post-AIA Power of Attorney Procedures --America Invents Act Mintz
Mar
19
2015
Enzo Biochem V. Applera Corp. – When “Words Can Hurt You” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
19
2015
Valeo North America, Inc.; Valeo S.A.; Valeo GmbH: Granting Leave to File Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2014-01203, 01204 Faegre Drinker
Mar
19
2015
Shire Development LLC v. Lucerne Biosciences, LLC: Granting In Part Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2014-00739 Faegre Drinker
Mar
19
2015
Unified Patents Inc. v. Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC: Granting Motions to Seal IPR2014-01252 Faegre Drinker
Mar
18
2015
Let’s Get Personal – Trademark Protection for Personal Names Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Mar
18
2015
Kaiser Aluminum v. Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC: Denying Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission IPR2014-01002 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins