Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Oct
2
2014
Claim Construction Clarified, Not Changed, Post-Verdict: Mformation Technologies v. Research In Motion McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Decision Not to Institute IPR Is Final and Not Appealable McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
License Definition Trumps Need for Actual Infringement Finding: Cellport Systems, Inc. v. Peiker Acustic GMBH & Co. KG McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
Foreign Marketing Materials Relevant to Domestic Infringement Amdocs (Israel): Ltd. v. Openet Telecom, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2014
Sham-Wow! Antitrust Liability May Attach to Sham Administrative Petitions: Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Mutual Pharm. Co., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2014
eBay, Inc. v. Advanced Auctions LLC: Denying Institution IPR2014-00806 Faegre Drinker
Oct
1
2014
Marking of Patented Products in the UK Mintz
Oct
1
2014
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. Endotach LLC: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review and Denying Motion for Joinder IPR2014-00695 Faegre Drinker
Oct
1
2014
The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease--You Won’t Get Fees if You Don’t Complain: Early Stragent, LLC v. Intel Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 1, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
1
2014
Silence of ANDA (Abbreviated New Drug Applications) with Respect to a Claim Limitation Does Not Constitute Infringement Ferring B.V. v. Watson Labs., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2014
Broad Language In Specification Can Provide Written Description Support: ScriptPro, LLC v. Innovation Associates, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2014
Kinetic Technologies, Inc. v. Skyworks Solutions, Inc.: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00529 Faegre Drinker
Oct
1
2014
Indeed, Inc., Monster Worldwide Inc., and TheLadders.com, Inc. v. Career Destination Development, LLC: Denying Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition Faegre Drinker
Oct
1
2014
Sequenom, Inc. v. The Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University: Decision Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00337 Faegre Drinker
Oct
1
2014
Motorola Mobility, LLC v. Intellectual Ventures I, LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing CBM2014-00084 Faegre Drinker
Oct
1
2014
Design Patent Case Digest: P.S. Products, Inc., v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
1
2014
States Have the Right to Protect Businesses Against Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2014
CaptionCall, LLC v. Ultratec, Inc.: Granting Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2013-00540, 541, 544 Faegre Drinker
Sep
30
2014
Post-Therasense IC Alive and Kicking at the Federal Circuit McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2014
Canon Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Decisions on Institution IPR2014-00535, 536, 537 Faegre Drinker
Sep
30
2014
The Doctrine of Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Maintains Its Vitality McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2014
American Calcar v. Amer. Honda Motor Co. – Therasense Goes Out For a Test Drive Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
30
2014
BioMarin Pharm. Inc. v. Genzyme therapeutic Products Ltd. P’ship.: Granting Request to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2013-00534, 537 Faegre Drinker
Sep
30
2014
11th Circuit: Award of Fees Affirmed in "Objectively Unreasonable" Copyright Action Where Plaintiff No Longer Possessed a Copy of the Copyrighted Material Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
30
2014
Regions Fin. Corp. v. Retirement Capital Access Mgmt, CBM2014-00012: Denying Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Stay Proceeding Faegre Drinker
Sep
30
2014
Sony Corporation v. Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00218 Faegre Drinker
Sep
30
2014
SAP America, Inc. v. Lakshmi Arunachalam, CBM2013-00013: Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins