July 12, 2020

Volume X, Number 194

July 10, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 09, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

This Blue Sky Law May Cast A Shadow On Promissory Note Amendments

The California Corporate Securities law requires qualification of three categories of transactions: issuer, recapitalization/reorganization transaction, and nonissuer.  Cal. Corp. Code §§ 25110, 25120 & 25130.  The second category includes "any change in the rights, preferences, privileges, or restrictions of or on outstanding securities".  Cal. Corp. Code § 250120(a)(1).  As has been discussed in this space, a promissory note may be a security for purposes of the CSL.  See Cal. Corp. Code § 25019 ("'Security' means any note . . .").  Consequently, the amendment of an outstanding promissory note that is a security is potentially subject to qualification under the CSL.  

The impact of Section 25120 is tempered somewhat by the existence of several exemptions.  With respect to changes involving debt securities, Section 25103(g) exempts any change in the rights of outstanding debt securities, except the following if they substantially and adversely affect any class of securities:

  • to change the rights to interest thereon;

  • to change their redemption provisions;

  • to make them redeemable;

  • to extend the maturity thereof or to change the amount payable thereon at maturity;

  • to change their voting rights;

  • to change their conversion rights;

  • to change sinking fund provisions; and

  • to make them subordinate to other indebtedness.

Other exemptions may also be available for changes in outstanding debt securities but hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.  Moreover, the qualification requirement will not apply at all if the debt instrument is not a security.

"[A] loan oft loses both itself and friend"

The requirement that certain changes in the rights of outstanding securities contrasts with numerous other statutes that are intended to protect borrowers (e.g.,usury, borrower disclosure and lender licensing laws).  The CSL is intended to protect investors.  In the case of debt securities, the investors are lenders and it is for their protection that qualification may be required.

© 2010-2020 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP National Law Review, Volume X, Number 181

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm
Partner

Keith Paul Bishop is a partner in Allen Matkins' Corporate and Securities practice group, and works out of the Orange County office. He represents clients in a wide range of corporate transactions, including public and private securities offerings of debt and equity, mergers and acquisitions, proxy contests and tender offers, corporate governance matters and federal and state securities laws (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Act), investment adviser, financial services regulation, and California administrative law. He regularly advises clients...

949-851-5428