June 25, 2022

Volume XII, Number 176

Advertisement
Advertisement

June 24, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 23, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 22, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

China SAFE (State Administration of Foreign Exchange) to Relax Foreign Exchange Control over Cross-border Guarantee

Introduction

On May 19, 2014, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) released Notice on the Promulgation of Foreign Exchange Administration Rules on Cross-border Guarantee (国家外汇管理局关于发布《跨境担保外汇管理规定》的通知) (“Circular 29”) with a view to promoting cross-border guarantee activities and convertibility under capital accounts. Circular 29 took effect on June 1, 2014 and twelve[1] other SAFE regulations regarding cross-border guarantee will be abrogated.

Cross-border Guarantee Subject to Circular 29

Generally speaking, in a guarantee agreement, a guarantor promises to the lender and undertakes that if a borrower fails to perform its obligations as agreed upon in a loan agreement, then the guarantor shall fulfill such obligations (also known as “performance of guarantee”). The basic financing structures of a guarantee can be shown in the following chart.

China

Under Circular 29, cross-border guarantees fall into three categories: (a) domestic guarantee to foreign loans (内保外贷), which refers to the circumstance where guarantor has a domestic domicile while each of lender and borrower has a foreign domicile ; (b) foreign guarantee to domestic loans (外保内贷), which refers to the circumstance where guarantor has a foreign domicile while the lender and borrower have domestic domiciles; and (c) other forms of cross-border guarantee, which refer to, without limitation, the following four circumstances: i) domestic guarantor + domestic/foreign borrower + domestic/foreign lender, ii) foreign guarantor + domestic/foreign borrower + domestic/foreign lender, iii) domestic guarantor + domestic borrower + domestic lender + foreign registration of guarantee, iv) foreign guarantor + foreign borrower + foreign lender + domestic registration of guarantee. Current SAFE rules[2] have a much narrower scope and only cover the provision of guarantee to foreign parties by domestic institutions and foreign guarantee to domestic loans.

Changes to Domestic Guarantee to Foreign Loans

  • Circular 29 cancels the amount limit and pre-approval requirement of domestic guarantee to foreign loans;

  • Except for a general restriction that a borrower can only use the loans within the scope of its regular business, Circular 29 cancels special restrictions on net asset ratio and affiliated relations of guarantor and borrower[3];

  • Registration rather than pre-approval is the main regulative measure under Circular 29;

  • The approval requirements for the performance of guarantee are cancelled under Circular 29 and the performance of guarantee can be processed directly by the bank;

  • Registration of foreign debt, if any, with SAFE is required after the performance of guarantee.

Changes to Foreign Guarantee to Domestic Loans

  • Circular 29 provides that lenders must be domestic financial institutions and borrowers must be non-financial institutions. Additionally, the debt should be either regular loans in RMB and foreign currency or line of credit, but not entrusted loans;

  • A centralized registration of lenders, i.e., domestic financial institutions, should be required;

  • Lender is allowed to collect the debt on its own account in the event of performance of guarantee;

  • Lender is responsible for registering its foreign debt, if any, with SAFE after the performance of guarantee. However, such foreign debt is not counted towards lender’s own quota for regular foreign debt.

Regulations of Other Forms of Cross-border Guarantee

Circular 29 provides that domestic institutions are allowed to sign other forms of guarantee agreements, which are neither foreign guarantee to domestic loan agreements nor domestic guarantee to foreign loan agreements, on their own account without registering with SAFE. However, relevant rules regarding foreign debt registration, direct investment and securities investment should still be followed as before.

Looking Ahead

Circular 29 clearly provides that the validity of cross-border guarantee agreements is independent from SAFE’s approval or registration requirements. With SAFE stepping back and relaxing its foreign exchange controls, cross-border borrowers and lenders should be less worried about regulatory delays effecting their financings. In particular, as domestic borrowers, Chinese enterprises will see more financing opportunities overseas, which will promote their merger and acquisition activities.

This post was written by Jiamu Sun.


[1] The twelve other SAFE regulations to be abrogated include: Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Administrative Measures for the Provision of Foreign Guarantees by Domestic Institutions (境内机构对外担保管理办法实施细则) (Hui-Fa [97] No. 10), Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on the Administration of External Guarantees Provided by Domestic Institutions (国家外汇管理局关于境内机构对外担保管理问题的通知) (Hui-Fa [2010] No. 39), Notice of State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Foreign Exchange Control Relating to Pilot Small-sum Onshore Loans against Offshore Guarantee in Certain Areas (国家外汇管理局关于在部分地区试行小额外保内贷业务有关外汇管理问题的通知) (Hui-Fa [2013] No. 40),State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Issues Relevant to Renminbi Loans Secured by Foreign Exchange Supplementary Circular (国家外汇管理局关于外汇担保项下人民币贷款有关问题的补充通知) (Hui-Fa [2005] No. 26), Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Issues Relevant to Examination & Ratification of Its Local Branches’ Work on Foreign Guarantee of Domestic Loans Quota of Domestic Enterprises in 2013 (国家外汇管理局关于核定部分分局2013年度中资企业外保内贷额度有关问题的通知) (Hui-Fa [2013] No. 23), Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange Concerning Relevant Issues on Making up the Registration of Foreign Debts and Foreign Sureties (国家外汇管理局关于外债、对外担保补登记有关问题的通知) ( [1999] No. 77), Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Regulating the Authorization for Examining and Approving Foreign-oriented Guarantee Performance (国家外汇管理局关于规范对外担保履约审批权限的通知) (Hui-Fa [2000] No. 84), Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on How to Define Unauthorized Pledge of Foreign Exchange(国家外汇管理局关于如何界定擅自以外汇作质押的函) (Hui-Fa [97] No. 2), Reply of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange to Issues Relevant to Financial Institutions’ Renminbi Loans Guaranteed with Foreign Exchange (国家外汇管理局关于金融机构外汇担保项下人民币贷款有关问题的复函) ([1999] No. 56), Reply of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Issues of Registration of Pledge of Insurance Interests (国家外汇管理局关于保险权益质押登记问题的批复) ( [2001] No. 144), Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Issues Relating to Examination & Ratification of the Quota Balance of Financing Foreign-oriented Guarantees Provided by Domestic Banks in 2011 (国家外汇管理局关于核定境内银行2011年度融资性对外担保余额指标有关问题的通知) (Hui-Fa [2011] No. 30), Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Transmitting and Implementing Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation of Relevant Issues on Applying PRC Guaranty Law (国家外汇管理局关于转发和执行最高人民法院关于适用中华人民共和国担保法若干问题的解释的通知) (Hui-Fa [2001] No. 6).

[2] Current SAFE rules regarding cross-border guarantee include: Measures on the Administration of External Guarantees Provided by Domestic Institutions (境内机构对外担保管理办法) effective on October 1, 1996, Rules for Implementing the Measures on the Administration of External Guarantees Provided by Domestic Institutions (境内机构对外担保管理办法实施细则) effective on January 1,1998 (to be abrogated from June 1, 2014), Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on the Issue of the Administration of External Guarantee by Domestic Institutions (关于境内机构对外担保管理问题的通知) effective on July 30, 2010 (to be abrogated from June 1, 2014), Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on the Release of Administrative Measures for Foreign Debt Registration (国家外汇管理局关于发布外债登记管理办法的通知) effective on May 13, 2013.

[3] Under Administrative Measures for the Provision of Guarantee to Foreign Parties by Domestic Institutions (境内机构对外担保管理办法实施细则), effective on October 1, 1996, a domestic-invested enterprise may only provide guarantee for foreign parties against the external debt in connection with the part of investment made by the Chinese party in its directly affiliated subsidiary or equity participation enterprise. Where a trade-oriented domestic-invested enterprise provides guarantee for foreign parties, in principle the ratio of net assets to total assets thereof may not be less than 15%. Where a non-trade-oriented domestic-invested enterprise provides guarantee for foreign parties, in principle the ratio of net assets to total assets thereof may not be less than 30%.

Copyright © 2022, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.National Law Review, Volume IV, Number 164
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Our Shanghai and Beijing offices serve as the center of the Firm’s Asia practice. These offices handle international matters involving not only China but also Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, and other markets in the region.

The attorneys and legal consultants in these offices have legal expertise in the corporate, commercial, trade, and disputes fields. Our Shanghai and Beijing offices are fully integrated into the Firm’s established practice groups, thus allowing for seamless service across borders and time zones....

86.21.2321.6018
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement